Serum test from GHRP-2/CJC1295

InfiniteMuscle · Aug 16, 2014

Ok guys this is crazy! I've posted this on another forum awhile back, but just wanted to share this with PM.. The blood draw was roughly 45mins after pinning..

GHRP-2 200mcg
CJC-1295 no Dac 200mcg

Research from www.ElitePeptides.com

RamboStallone · Aug 16, 2014

That is some great results.

ajdos · Aug 17, 2014

NICE!!

Elvia1023 · Aug 17, 2014

No surprise at all. Obviously you got the timing spot on for you which is great. I have seen studies were results were much higher. It just shows you how much your body can produce. You can't go wrong with a simple cjc no dac and ghrp-2 stack. I like to try new things but that will always be effective. Thanks for posting

InfiniteMuscle · Aug 17, 2014

Elvia,

Id be curious to try it again maybe at 90 mins.. Think it would be higher? lower?

Elvia1023 · Aug 17, 2014

InfiniteMuscle said:
Elvia,

Id be curious to try it again maybe at 90 mins.. Think it would be higher? lower?

I haven't a clue. So many factors involved. I would imagine it would be lower but a great experiment. I think many would appreciate you doing that so we can see the difference and learn more about how long your serum gh is elevated on that combo.

I wish I lived in the US and could get tested that easy. I would love to example like you have. Even adding things like prami into the mix to see if that made much of a difference to an already high scoring protocol.

Elvia1023 · Aug 17, 2014

I assume you are SuperLift from IronMag?

ajdos · Aug 17, 2014

InfiniteMuscle said:
Elvia,

Id be curious to try it again maybe at 90 mins.. Think it would be higher? lower?

Im about 90% sure it would come out lower. My rudementary understanding is the pulse is like a hopper, when you pulse it out the hopper needs x amount of time to replenish (or so it was explained in another post back way when).
This is why for the most part you see 3 x's a day dosing on the ghrp2+mod...in order to allow for the theoretical hopper to replenish and have something to precurse from the peptides.
I am not a specialist, just what I read a couple years back, as we all know these supposed guidelines change. So I would defer to E or JJ on this in a second.

sammy555 · Aug 17, 2014

InfiniteMuscle said:
Elvia,

Id be curious to try it again maybe at 90 mins.. Think it would be higher? lower?

Don't think it would be higher, I'd think lower. It might peak a little higher than 30 bit I think you got the timing somewhere near peak but the drop of is pretty rapid to. Try it, I'll be quite happy if you prove me wrong. That's why a 2iu gh chaser works so well as you get the sharp peak and all that lovely ffa release that comesl with that,then a nice prolonged effect from the gh. I plan to use ghrp2/ mod grf on my cruise just twice daily. Want to cruise on the bare minimum for once and resensitise my shit to every thing.

Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk 2

Elvia1023 · Aug 17, 2014

ajdos said:
Im about 90% sure it would come out lower. My rudementary understanding is the pulse is like a hopper, when you pulse it out the hopper needs x amount of time to replenish (or so it was explained in another post back way when).
This is why for the most part you see 3 x's a day dosing on the ghrp2+mod...in order to allow for the theoretical hopper to replenish and have something to precurse from the peptides.
I am not a specialist, just what I read a couple years back, as we all know these supposed guidelines change. So I would defer to E or JJ on this in a second.

sammy555 said:
Don't think it would be higher, I'd think lower. It might peak a little higher than 30 bit I think you got the timing somewhere near peak but the drop of is pretty rapid to. Try it, I'll be quite happy if you prove me wrong. That's why a 2iu gh chaser works so well as you get the sharp peak and all that lovely ffa release that comesl with that,then a nice prolonged effect from the gh. I plan to use ghrp2/ mod grf on my cruise just twice daily. Want to cruise on the bare minimum for once and resensitise my shit to every thing.

Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk 2

I completely agree. There are so many factors involved though. The speed in the drop would be great to know. That drop time would be different for different people. But as Sammy stated it would be pretty rapid. It would be amazing to get extensive testing done but obviously that is not possible for the OP (and we couldn't expect it). I think 90 mins is a great second time frame to test. From those results we would learn a lot. If the pulse was around the same that would be incredible. But I imagine it would be much lower. I bet even at 60 mins it may be dropping fairly rapidly.

I would love to see someone test pramipexole at say 0.5mg. If anyone done that I would think 2 hours post administration would be best for testing purposes.

InfiniteMuscle · Aug 17, 2014

Yes Elvia, Im superlift. Sounds like I need to test again at 60 mins and 90 mins. Lol. It cost roughly $50 to test so it's not that bad. Just don't want to dump a lot of money in to it seeing how I already know it's great!

Elvia1023 · Aug 17, 2014

InfiniteMuscle said:
Yes Elvia, Im superlift. Sounds like I need to test again at 60 mins and 90 mins. Lol. It cost roughly $50 to test so it's not that bad. Just don't want to dump a lot of money in to it seeing how I already know it's great!

I think 90 mins would be a good time. Or even 70 mins. If you do that we would be very appreciative. Perhaps some of us could come together and donate say 10$ each so you can get 2 more tests done.

cauthen96 · Aug 17, 2014

I will gladly pitch in.. Also was this a blend or two separate vials?

RamboStallone · Aug 17, 2014

I think a better test would be a dose of 100 mcgs and see if you get the same results.

Elvia1023 · Aug 18, 2014

RamboStallone said:
I think a better test would be a dose of 100 mcgs and see if you get the same results.

That would be a great test. Me personally I want to see as high as possible. The reason being there are still many close minded guys out there and they say pep tides are crap and you have to use HGH. How you can't produce high numbers when using your own GH. I don't care what people want to buy and get all the HGH they want. But it pleases me when I see high tests so guys realize we are not actually bullshitting you with how effective pep tides can be.

RamboStallone · Aug 18, 2014

All the gh pep tests I see yield higher numbers then 80% or more of the hgh out there. I am seeing and feeling the effects that guys report with grade A hgh from the peptides. They can believe it or not, idc I know it works and I will continue to use it while guys blow their money on bunk chinese gh.

I remember seeing tests showing that the 100mcg saturation dose yielded the same results as 250mcg dose. It would be nice to see more tests confirming this.

InfiniteMuscle · Aug 18, 2014

It was not a dual blend. We can definitely get a pool going and have another test done.. Im all for it!

EFShadow · Aug 18, 2014

InfiniteMuscle said:
It was not a dual blend. We can definitely get a pool going and have another test done.. Im all for it!

Why would a dual bland versus standalones affect the results?

RamboStallone · Aug 18, 2014

EFShadow said:
Why would a dual bland versus standalones affect the results?

It shouldn't. Cauthen asked the question maybe he can elaborate why?

sammy555 · Aug 18, 2014

EFShadow said:
Why would a dual bland versus standalones affect the results?

The theory goes that ghrp and mod grf in the same vial will degrade quicker hence why we leave an air bubble if we mix in the same syringe for later use. The chemists are supposed to have found away around this though but I've seen no tests to confirm our deny.

Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk 2