- Joined
- Sep 12, 2013
- Messages
- 192
I had Racepicks post this for me in the HGH Testing thread since I can't yet, but I thought it might be something everyone would be interested in.
**broken link removed**
A study with 50 healthy men average age 25.6, showing effects of 9.5iu versus 19iu of GH (genotropin and/or norditropin were used)
The most relevant figure being this one (THE TOP CHART IS WOMEN, BOTTOM IS MEN)
**broken link removed**
The average IGF-1 level of 9.5iu in men came out to be around 800 and that was with pharma grade.
Also shows how much benefit falls off when going into a much higher range (19iu) seeming that the cost to benefit ratio does not justify itself strictly based on IGF-1 levels. Although individual pools of local IGF-1 in muscle can't be measured.
Study can be taken with a grain of salt, but atleast it can show some sort of baseline in men who are not on AAS, slin, and AI's where IGF-1 levels are effected.
**broken link removed**
A study with 50 healthy men average age 25.6, showing effects of 9.5iu versus 19iu of GH (genotropin and/or norditropin were used)
The most relevant figure being this one (THE TOP CHART IS WOMEN, BOTTOM IS MEN)
**broken link removed**
The average IGF-1 level of 9.5iu in men came out to be around 800 and that was with pharma grade.
Also shows how much benefit falls off when going into a much higher range (19iu) seeming that the cost to benefit ratio does not justify itself strictly based on IGF-1 levels. Although individual pools of local IGF-1 in muscle can't be measured.
Study can be taken with a grain of salt, but atleast it can show some sort of baseline in men who are not on AAS, slin, and AI's where IGF-1 levels are effected.