Looking for judges input

[saps]

OK so this is for my sister who for various reasons is trigger shy to join here but anyway.

She was awarded second in last weekends NPC WA State Ironman in the Woman's Physique.

Please tell me why this is?

Photos below along with the scorecard.

What really gets me if how can 2 judges place Yamada 2nd over Susan when the rest of the judges all had her 4-6 and mostly 6 I just don't get it. I understand woman's physique is new and evolving in terms of the standards but some consistency amongst judges would be nice so competitors know what package to bring in. In every show I've ever seen you could always tell a class winner as soon as everyone turned around. How anyone with eyes can say Susan wasn't the best looking up there escapes me. Clearly I'm biased so I'll shut up and let the pics speak.
Pics are from MD and not pre judging compulsory's but still should be enough to give feedback.

Here's Susan:
**broken link removed**
**broken link removed**
**broken link removed**
**broken link removed**
The so called winner:
**broken link removed**
**broken link removed**
**broken link removed**

Yamada 6th for most but 2 judges had her ahead of my sis:
**broken link removed**
**broken link removed**
**broken link removed**

Scorecard:
**broken link removed**

Susan has 2 more shows in the next 4 weekends so if tailoring needs to be done now is the time to do it.
Thanks in advance to all judges who gave input

 

[PHIL HERNON]

Well

Throw out highest and lowest score but your sister beats the other gal badly. No offense to the other gal.

 

[saps]

Throw out highest and lowest score but your sister beats the other gal badly. No offense to the other gal.

Thanks Phil, yeah I just can't see how its not obvious. Everyone there told her she won. Just found out this morning the winners trainer was a major show sponsor though. Sad if that was the deciding factor

Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk 2