Why is it seen that as a natural IF enhances your results vs on gear it hinders it?
Assuming you eat enough why would 6 small meals need to happen if you're on gear vs off and why is it such a dogmatic thing like as soon as the pin goes in my ass cheek if I don't eat 6 meals a day I'm short changing my results
I'm looking for answers not trying to act like a smart ass but generally I just end up a bit leaner if I do IF while blasting vs otherwise just end the blast s bit fatter and end up losing more while cutting
I get people say you need to EAT to grow but I can outeat my needs very easy and pile on excessive fat so more meals makes it easier to get out of my cal requirements.
So I'm curious about your perspectives and reasoning why IF short changes your results on roids but not other wise.
Assuming you eat enough why would 6 small meals need to happen if you're on gear vs off and why is it such a dogmatic thing like as soon as the pin goes in my ass cheek if I don't eat 6 meals a day I'm short changing my results
I'm looking for answers not trying to act like a smart ass but generally I just end up a bit leaner if I do IF while blasting vs otherwise just end the blast s bit fatter and end up losing more while cutting
I get people say you need to EAT to grow but I can outeat my needs very easy and pile on excessive fat so more meals makes it easier to get out of my cal requirements.
So I'm curious about your perspectives and reasoning why IF short changes your results on roids but not other wise.
Last edited: