Has anyone tried both? Which one yields better results?
S Stronger4ever New member Registered Joined Feb 5, 2011 Messages 80 Feb 26, 2011 #1 Has anyone tried both? Which one yields better results?
M muscleguys New member Registered Joined Jul 26, 2010 Messages 170 Feb 26, 2011 #2 It seems, DES for site growth, is believed by many, to be superior. Check out Pangs AO IGF DES thread.
It seems, DES for site growth, is believed by many, to be superior. Check out Pangs AO IGF DES thread.
SmallTownIron Banned Kilo Klub Member Joined Nov 19, 2009 Messages 2,226 Feb 26, 2011 #3 DES by far. Had great results from Genesis Peptides here on the boards:headbang::headbang:
S Stronger4ever New member Registered Joined Feb 5, 2011 Messages 80 Feb 26, 2011 #4 The difference is in size or something else? How fast you notice results? I'm on Lr3 now for 6 days. I really like it so far
The difference is in size or something else? How fast you notice results? I'm on Lr3 now for 6 days. I really like it so far
TractionIssues Banned Joined Oct 4, 2009 Messages 398 Feb 26, 2011 #5 Has anyone hear of the difference between the two in terms of injury repair, like tendons or joints?
A aminoman74 Banned Joined Jan 28, 2009 Messages 1,002 Feb 26, 2011 #6 TractionIssues said: Has anyone hear of the difference between the two in terms of injury repair, like tendons or joints? Click to expand... I like ifd for tendon issues it heals them fast like mine did.Other then that i dont see much from it.
TractionIssues said: Has anyone hear of the difference between the two in terms of injury repair, like tendons or joints? Click to expand... I like ifd for tendon issues it heals them fast like mine did.Other then that i dont see much from it.