- Joined
- Jan 4, 2011
- Messages
- 1,079
Wow, that's awesome!
Her name is Naomi Kutin, she's 10 years old, in the 5th grade, and she competed in an all ages event! She is 4'8" and lifts in the 97lb division. She did a raw squat of 215lbs. The old record was 209lbs, set by a 44 year old European woman!!
Here's the story:
10-year-old Naomi Kutin sets women
I wish I would of had someone get me started that young. Very impressive. As long as she wants to do it then I see no problem. She might get injured. But that's a chance every powerlifter takes.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk
Ur probably right. But at least she will hopefully learn a good work ethic and discipline from it. What I think alot of kids are lacking. Even ones my age.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk
There is no question that what she has done is very impressive and beats most odds. It is also nice that she is not obese etc. But from a medical prospective there is no fucking way i would let me 10yo son or daughter lift heavy weights like that? For what? It doesnt accomplish anything besides stunting their growth at the very least besides exposing them to serious injury when their musculoskeletal system is not even fully matured yet. They can stay healthy doing other sports such as swimming, soccer etc. IMHO that is irresponsible parenting right there.
Serious question here Dr Alpha...Is it really that bad? As children we ran hard. Feet smashing into the ground, knees absorbing crushing force from jumping off of things. We rode our bikes, and went off of jumps...Some big, some small...Accidents on our bikes or just riding for hours on end. Kids play pee wee football...Smashing into one another. They do martial arts. Is weightlifting in a controlled setting, in a weight progressive manner, really going to inflict that much injury to the body versus the regular ware and tare a child puts on their body already? Honestly, my initial reaction is the same as yours! Then I thought about it and just wondered if it really is that bad. Time for me to research and let science tell me the answer!!
Serious question here Dr Alpha...Is it really that bad? As children we ran hard. Feet smashing into the ground, knees absorbing crushing force from jumping off of things. We rode our bikes, and went off of jumps...Some big, some small...Accidents on our bikes or just riding for hours on end. Kids play pee wee football...Smashing into one another. They do martial arts. Is weightlifting in a controlled setting, in a weight progressive manner, really going to inflict that much injury to the body versus the regular ware and tare a child puts on their body already? Honestly, my initial reaction is the same as yours! Then I thought about it and just wondered if it really is that bad. Time for me to research and let science tell me the answer!!
It is a very good question. But yes weight lifting is that much worse. a 50lb pound kid falling and running into each other with full gear and the nominal speeds dont USUALLY cause serious issues. Obviously even within those fields i am seeing kids younger and younger with ACL and medial meniscus tears on a weekly basis. You cant compare high impact exercise when using your own body weight to a 10yo squatting 200lbs. The effects on the spine specifically with such exercise that is meant to be so repetitive has major issues.
We know for sure that if anything resistant type training if nothing causes early calcification of long bones and will stunt growth. I am a prime example of that shit. My father is 5'8", my younger brother is 5'8", most men in my family are ~5'8" and my dumb ass started lifting weights at 14 and i grew to 5'5". I have several ortho surgeons as friends and when we work out they never ever squat or do dead lifts. When they see others do it, they laugh and joke to say that is their bread maker right there. We have grown ass men with much stronger skeletal structures that injure, rupture and tear dics, knees all the time with one small movement during these exercises. You expect a child to do any better?
The question you really have to ask is why? Weight lifting is not like tennis, golf that if you start them at 5yo, they have significant advantages. I could have started my weight lifting at 18-19 and would fare no worse than i am doing now minus maybe a couple of inches taller. Many guys here were twiggs between 18-20 and are monsters now. So there is no need to start weight lifting at 10yo.
Thank you Alpha...Good points. So it's a proven fact that weight lifting causes early calcification of long bones and will stunt growth? I've read different theories on this over the years. Again, time to research some more!!
Hey Alpha, have you ever posted pics of yourself (besides your avatar)? If not, you should! I would nominate you for member of the month due to your contributions here!!...A posted picture is one of the prerequisites for this honor!!