The question is:
What would the members like to have tested? HGH or Oils and Orals? If we do this project, we can't do both. You all decide.
A 75% purity, high dimer, trash GH can still give you a decent serum score... An IGF-1 test is too unreliable, there's too many other factors affecting IGF-1 levels to draw any conclusions about the GH an individual is using.I vote for oil testing. As we know, oils can vary greatly. HGH can be done individually by the user through serum GH test or even just an IGF-1 reading. I don't use too many orals so I'd say personally skip those.
The question is:
What would the members like to have tested? HGH or Oils and Orals? If we do this project, we can't do both. You all decide.
Isn't there anasci for AAS testing?? Why would you want to set up a competing testing project instead of contributing to the existing one on anasci?
I had soured on some aspects of the testing, not the actual results it was other things, but the tests themselves were invaluable. I would contribute again for some oils and tabs testing of the most popular sponsors....
By the way, if you have concerns about anything that was/wasn't done in the past. Let me know. Either post or PM. I would really like to get any feedback you can offer.