who defines maximum benefits? gh works well with or without test. you get the added benefit of increases hormones with ......hormones but the gh still works the same.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk
When you say it still works the same, what exactly are you referring to?
I'm not calling you out brother, not in the least, I'm just curious on what you mean.
Now IMO, HGH has poor properties far as skeletal muscle mass when taken by itself,
and it's definitely not worth the large price if you are taking it solely for gaining muscle, and by itself it's really only going to provide fat loss or “sculpting” if you will.
Keep in mine that lean body mass does not necessarily mean muscle,People who lean out on HGH only, and yet gain 8-10 lbs, at the same time of losing fat don't consider that HGH will increase skeletal "bone" density, and tissue growth ( not necessarily muscle ).
When used with Test The only real use in gaining muscle may be as a synergistic effects. Now far as tissue repair that's different. Testosterone is a must with HGH to gain quality muscle mass.
Testosterone is far superior for muscle growth over HGH any day....
With the cost of a lengthy intake of HGH at 8-10ius alone, one could spend that on other
"compound's" that are anabolic, and gain better results and yield more quality muscle....
Spend the money on food and Test, and maybe some tbol/vars, and add some NPP to the mix, or even some mast or proviron....
And this all can be achieved with no where near as much that would be spent on HGH...
The results one can expect with HGH alone at the end of the day would fail to provide anyone with impressing results to consider spending the funds and doing it again.
Why would anyone not want to run other compounds with it, like it's counter part "Test"?
Just IMHO...