BOOMSHAKER said:(no flamming, just making a point)
A football player wether he is on steroids or not is being paid millions of dollars to play football, he gets injured on the field. You feel bad for him, they carry him off. Later on he comes back on the field and you cheer like crazy for him. You say "damn that guys a hell of an athlete". But what you refuse to agree to or listen to is that he went back to the dressing room, got injected with anti-inflammatory roids and was sent back into the game!
Later on he retires from football and gets into the hall of fame! Did he really deserve to be in the hall of fame? Or should they put on the pedestal where his head (bust) should be a sculpture of the needle and roids he took for years everytime he got injured and need a little extra help!? See my point?
No I dont
There is a difference between corticosteroids and steroids, between recovery from injury and performance enhancing.
Perhaps an example that clears up where my opinion comes from, Barry Bond would still be a decent and known baseballplayer without steroids, Arnold however, where would he be now without steroids