Fuck all the Arnold haters!!!
I would bet my life that he did more gear than any other competitor in his day. He admitted popping dbol like m&m's. Shooting primo and decal like it was a daily thing. I love arnold but would take Columbo over him any day. Arnold had the marketing hype over anyone else. Now im not hating on him or doubting him cause i love him, but he was a product of marketing hype and advertising. Lets face it, he was THE FIRST BOY that Joe Weider took under his arm while he (Joe) was trying to make a name for himself in a very new sport.
Dude, you're freakn dellusional!!! Take Columbo over Arnold?! HaHaHa, you're funny! (let me guess, you're a short dude right?) Columbo was a shrimp compared to Arnold! If it wasn't for him being best buddies with Arnold he would've NEVER EVER won a Mr O!!!! That's a fact bro! They gave him the "O" in 1976 (after Arnold retired) because that's what Arnold wanted! Eventhough their were other guys who should've won, namely Zane, Waller, & Coe. All had better physiques than Franco! In 1981, again after Arnold retired a 2nd time, he won despite the fact he basically had one leg (he had torn a thigh muscle while training), his legs were absolute crap! Again, look at the lineup! You had Platz (at his all-time best!), Johnny Fuller, Steve Davis, Danny Padilla, Ken Waller, Ed Corney, Mike Katz, Dennis Tinerino; Roy Callender, Roger Walker, Samir Bannout, Jusup Wilkosz. And Franco beats all of these guys?! Total political crap! It was the most controversial Mr O win ever (worse than Arnold's 1980 comeback win over Menztner!) IMO, he didin''t deserve either win!
And as for Arnold being the "golden boy", Weider had been promoting Draper for years (they used to workout together in Jersey and Draper worked for the Weiders for years)!
The Facts are that Arnold was BY THE GREATEST BODYBUILDER of his era! Their would not be anyone close to building a physique comparable to his, as dominant, detailed, balanced, and as huge until Lee Haney came around a decade later!
When you look at that film of him at 20 yrs old, check out the size & detail, quality of his muscles. The leanness and visible striations. He had what they used to call "onion skin". You don't see that shit anymore! No matter how lean & shreaded a guy looks nowadays, they don't have that "look"! The peak and size of his biceps! If a bodybuilder has peaks like that today it's most likely from doing site injects with Synthol and/or lots of gear! He had a x-mas tree & striations on his lower lats for God's sake bro! Not until 1983 when Samir won did anyone display the now commom x-mas tree in his lower erectors. The thighs were huge with decent muscle seperation for a time in which legs weren't a priority at all. All this done with no more knowledge of nutrition/bodybuilding diet than what other guys were doing at the time. Most of which was trial and error, mostly wrong in todays bodybuilding world! For God's sake, he had no bloating, distended gut, gyno, or MPB! He wasn't doing any Cardio, or using fat burners, or Keto diets or any of that shit! He had good abs. Check out the vacuum pose! He just plain busted his ass in the gym (sometimes for 3-4 hrs a day, 6 days a week, doind 2 a days!) and lifting some serious heavy fukin weights!!! Let's see today's BBers try to follow his training methods. They would drop dead of a fukn heart attack hahaha! Yes, he was on "heavy" use of gear, but I'm sure by todays standards it was probably 20%-30% of what everyday bodybuilders are using nowadays, just to be featured in a muscle rag!
The vast majority of bodybuilders, competitive and regular gym rats (including me!) will NEVER be able to develop a physique that looks anything like what Arnold looked like at 20 yrs old, no matter the type, amount, or duration of drug use! Let alone look like Arnold during his peak years of 1972-1975! PERIOD! END OF STORY!!!