- Joined
- Apr 4, 2003
- Messages
- 1,948
Terrific thread. There is no free lunch. Everything we do in life in excess of moderation has a payback in other areas. This even includes the "super fit" not just the "big muscled".
I can honestly say that outside of a scholarship being "big" has added very little positive to my life other than friends I have made through training. I did have the heart failure. I do have the apnea. I do have the insulin sensitivity. These are not good things.
I truly feel that living a good portion of my life at 260-270 has probably meant I have shortened it. However I also consider that if I didn't live my life in the gym I may have still weighed 260 except all fat. I also might have liver damage from drinking. One thing is certain for me, I am not just going to work and going home, I am going to have some other outlet, and going to the gym is probably the best choice I could make versus "happy hour", clubs, etc.
I have no regrets, and I certainly agree that people should be allowed to do what they wish if it does not harm others, but I would like the information in the above post to be considered.
Lets be honest, I bet less than 20% of us have ever been on stage, or if we are are going to do it again. For the rest of us there is even less reason to go extreme.
Systems all fail at the extremes. Moderation is the key young man, moderation!
I also feel that being "extreme" has other costs as well other than physical. I would prefer to be successful at all facets of my life. Would I agree to have half my income if I could compete nationally? No. Would I agree to make double the income and go around being a slob? No. Would I sacriface the relationship with my girlfriend, dog, family, friends if it meant I could double my income or compete nationally? No.
Pekkerwood
I can honestly say that outside of a scholarship being "big" has added very little positive to my life other than friends I have made through training. I did have the heart failure. I do have the apnea. I do have the insulin sensitivity. These are not good things.
I truly feel that living a good portion of my life at 260-270 has probably meant I have shortened it. However I also consider that if I didn't live my life in the gym I may have still weighed 260 except all fat. I also might have liver damage from drinking. One thing is certain for me, I am not just going to work and going home, I am going to have some other outlet, and going to the gym is probably the best choice I could make versus "happy hour", clubs, etc.
I have no regrets, and I certainly agree that people should be allowed to do what they wish if it does not harm others, but I would like the information in the above post to be considered.
Lets be honest, I bet less than 20% of us have ever been on stage, or if we are are going to do it again. For the rest of us there is even less reason to go extreme.
Systems all fail at the extremes. Moderation is the key young man, moderation!
I also feel that being "extreme" has other costs as well other than physical. I would prefer to be successful at all facets of my life. Would I agree to have half my income if I could compete nationally? No. Would I agree to make double the income and go around being a slob? No. Would I sacriface the relationship with my girlfriend, dog, family, friends if it meant I could double my income or compete nationally? No.
Pekkerwood