biosecure act

[whacked]

I could understand GLPs being on the list—because they need to protect big pharmas wallets (big donors to political parties)

But banning bpc, tb500, kpv —peptides that have proven to be well tolerated and effective with a good safety profile—is just completely moronic imo.

There’s so many people consuming copious amounts of alcohol, weed, opiates and all kinds of drugs in the country that they could focus on, yet they want to crackdown on inflammation and healing peptides? Makes no sense

Preach !!

 

[madg]

I could understand GLPs being on the list—because they need to protect big pharmas wallets (big donors to political parties)

But banning bpc, tb500, kpv —peptides that have proven to be well tolerated and effective with a good safety profile—is just completely moronic imo.

There’s so many people consuming copious amounts of alcohol, weed, opiates and all kinds of drugs in the country that they could focus on, yet they want to crackdown on inflammation and healing peptides? Makes no sense

They not want you be healthy

 

[massephase]

I could understand GLPs being on the list—because they need to protect big pharmas wallets (big donors to political parties)

But banning bpc, tb500, kpv —peptides that have proven to be well tolerated and effective with a good safety profile—is just completely moronic imo.

There’s so many people consuming copious amounts of alcohol, weed, opiates and all kinds of drugs in the country that they could focus on, yet they want to crackdown on inflammation and healing peptides? Makes no sense

It makes total sense though for a couple of people who will make a lot of money

 

[buck]

Drugs are a for profit business. Always been that way. Pharma companies are not charities. Pretty much no other companies are charities either. Nether are Dr or hospitals(usually). If someone was cutting into my business i would try to stop them. Can't think of to many people that would be happy with someone stealing a part of their paycheck. I don't expect businesses to run any other way.

 

[massephase]

Drugs are a for profit business. Always been that way. Pharma companies are not charities. Pretty much no other companies are charities either. Nether are Dr or hospitals(usually). If someone was cutting into my business i would try to stop them. Can't think of to many people that would be happy with someone stealing a part of their paycheck. I don't expect businesses to run any other way.

So if you sell bread and I sell bread, you will try to stop me?

 

[buck]

So if you sell bread and I sell bread, you will try to stop me?

Only if you are stealing my bread that i have a patent on. But yes i will try to advertise my bread is better then yours if you are following the rules.

 

[control]

What a coincidence of timing huh?...Reta completes Phase 3...trump and RFK speak publicly about GLP prices...Puts the TRUMP RX plan in effect...Multi trillion dollar empire being built

I'm glad a mod pointed this out. I was about to say the same thing (even though we're not supposed to talk about politics)....

 

[abt10]

one of the MAJOR peptide vendors has a considerably smaller product list over the course of the last couple months.
they usually restock, but see no restock notices for many of the popular peps.
so there may be something to this..

 

[Lift2staysane]

I'm glad a mod pointed this out. I was about to say the same thing (even though we're not supposed to talk about politics)....

Industry needs to give him his bribe, just like the cannabis industry did. We live in pay to play times more than ever.

 

[Thebiggestdumbass]

BIOSECURE Act Update | Morrison Foerster

Read the Japanese version.The BIOSECURE Act, which restricts the ability of U.S. executive agencies to contract with...

www.mofo.com

This is stopping American companies from purchasing API for use from non approved out of country vendors. I don’t think we’ll see issues as long as your vendor isn’t labeling it as a health supplement or medical product

 

[musclemuscle]

https://twitter.com/x/status/2027503763574165517

 

[cdnyc85]

I could understand GLPs being on the list—because they need to protect big pharmas wallets (big donors to political parties)

But banning bpc, tb500, kpv —peptides that have proven to be well tolerated and effective with a good safety profile—is just completely moronic imo.

There’s so many people consuming copious amounts of alcohol, weed, opiates and all kinds of drugs in the country that they could focus on, yet they want to crackdown on inflammation and healing peptides? Makes no sense

Bpc and tb500 have no long term safety data in humans...

 

[lestatgear]

"Bogus black market peptides". Who's Rogan kidding? You know he's using peptides, he's using or used gear and GH, and I'm sure a lot of it black market, especially peptides. I like Joe a lot and listen to him a lot, but what a fake ass statement.

 

[Gaintrain]

Fuck the government, big Pharma, and the entire corrupt ass system!

 

[alfresco]

"Bogus black market peptides". Who's Rogan kidding? You know he's using peptides, he's using or used gear and GH, and I'm sure a lot of it black market, especially peptides. I like Joe a lot and listen to him a lot, but what a fake ass statement.

Not intended to derail this thread . . but . . .

I’m just now listening to a podcast with him and Kennedy. (Not starting a political discussion, just reference.)

Rogan is pretty much a yes man who knows his audience knows his ratings, knows how to get them and is very good at all the above. And he is a good conversationalist who rides his guest opinions (most?) to get ratings. And to be fair, he gets some great guests that otherwise might not have a platform for that many listeners. I’ll give him that.

I have never heard him be confrontational but in all honesty, I don’t listen to all his podcasts as most of his guests don’t interest me.

Just an FYI, I listen to a lot of podcast interviews, and when the host speaks more than the guest (Joe sometimes, most times?) I move on, not a good interviewer / interview in my opinion.

 

[Goodfella1988]

Not intended to derail this thread . . but . . .

I’m just now listening to a podcast with him and Kennedy. (Not starting a political discussion, just reference.)

Rogan is pretty much a yes man who knows his audience knows his ratings, knows how to get them and is very good at all the above. And he is a good conversationalist who rides his guest opinions (most?) to get ratings. And to be fair, he gets some great guests that otherwise might not have a platform for that many listeners. I’ll give him that.

I have never heard him be confrontational but in all honesty, I don’t listen to all his podcasts as most of his guests don’t interest me.

Just an FYI, I listen to a lot of podcast interviews, and when the host speaks more than the guest (Joe sometimes, most times?) I move on, not a good interviewer / interview in my opinion.

Nailed it! The way he spoke about Rich after he passed away, like he didn’t know who he was or possibly even met him before I find really hard to believe. But of course, he only spoke like that cus that’s exactly what his audience is thinking of rich, so he just goes with it for the sake of them. He’s done/said some pretty trash things on his podcast that are just low and pathetic…