Masteron as main anabolic compound in cycles
I've heard this suggested by a few "experts" in the field, namely Broderick Chavez and Alex Kikel, where Masteron is used as the main anabolic compound.
A cycle might be set up with 3mg/kg testosterone and then 5mg to 10mg/kg Masteron.
Broderick suggested that 100g of contractile tissue can be built per week like this. He stated that all steroids have pretty much the same contractile tissue building capability and only differ on side effects. This could be positive and/or negative, but what would set them apart would be intramuscular fluid retention, nitrogen retention etc etc. So in effect the actual muscle being built would be the same between Masteron and for example Deca, it's just Deca would cause more non contractile tissue gains which are transient anyway. Couple this with increased negative side effects he suggests that there is no point running other compounds and suggests Masteron is essentially as close to perfect as we'll get.
What's everyone's thoughts on this concept?
I've heard this suggested by a few "experts" in the field, namely Broderick Chavez and Alex Kikel, where Masteron is used as the main anabolic compound.
A cycle might be set up with 3mg/kg testosterone and then 5mg to 10mg/kg Masteron.
Broderick suggested that 100g of contractile tissue can be built per week like this. He stated that all steroids have pretty much the same contractile tissue building capability and only differ on side effects. This could be positive and/or negative, but what would set them apart would be intramuscular fluid retention, nitrogen retention etc etc. So in effect the actual muscle being built would be the same between Masteron and for example Deca, it's just Deca would cause more non contractile tissue gains which are transient anyway. Couple this with increased negative side effects he suggests that there is no point running other compounds and suggests Masteron is essentially as close to perfect as we'll get.
What's everyone's thoughts on this concept?