How many decades of scientific testing was there before there was proof that cigarettes were definitely proven to be unhealthy. It doesn't mean they weren't always unhealthy and it just took many years to prove it as all the pro-cigarette smokers and companies did everything they could to disavow the truth. The best you could get on a pack of cigarettes was that it "may" be harmful tho your health. And I have read of no big long term studies on the effects of marijuana as it would be hard to get enough people over the last few decades to admit they were committing crimes and have their names on a rooster so they could be tracked.
ummm dude... really? a logical human can not actually have this opinion.
maybe you missed the facts?
tobacco is actually addictive and harmful and has been big business for many years. it was 100% known prior to much of the explosion of tobaccoo in the early part of the last century that the shit was bad for you.
medical cominuty was intentionally given misinformation and kickbacks.
govt issues cigs to soldiers
govt is hand in hand in cock in ass with these mofos...
now... the history of weed?
lol
really?
used to create fear and racism on the population en mass. used as a tool to take away personal freedoms and allow the govt intrusion into personal lives.
every time in every medical report since the first tax stamp in 1937 all medical info has gone aggainst criminilization.
the govt was looking hard for things "bad" in weed for like 60 years dude.... and they couldnt find it. they were trying to find good things for tobacco and they had to make up 100% lies. they could not find bad in weed and had to make up lies. thats the only similarity.
i have talked at length with the dude who was in charge of the govt project for decades...
please if you dont actually know, spend 5 mins with google. dont believe the hype.