- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
- Messages
- 146
From an anecdotal standpoint, do the vetrans on here notice less fat gain from being on a cycle when at a sub 10% bf then when higher. I have heard
in articles and such that the body is less primed to store fat(from a hormonal standpoint) when one is at their leanest. I had one bottle of sus-500(otc) left and wanted to run a quick high dose 2 weeker, my waist is stuck at about the 30.75 31 inch mark and i am really in my "diet mindset" and am zoned in to where i want mentally. Is it better to go on a moderately high caloric(4500-5000 kcal, I am very active) add a couple of pounds and use the increased metabolic rate to then diet down, or just continue cutting at the 1500-2000 kcal) that i have been at for the last month and a half.
My intensions are lowering bf not increasing size, but i don't know which approach is better
in articles and such that the body is less primed to store fat(from a hormonal standpoint) when one is at their leanest. I had one bottle of sus-500(otc) left and wanted to run a quick high dose 2 weeker, my waist is stuck at about the 30.75 31 inch mark and i am really in my "diet mindset" and am zoned in to where i want mentally. Is it better to go on a moderately high caloric(4500-5000 kcal, I am very active) add a couple of pounds and use the increased metabolic rate to then diet down, or just continue cutting at the 1500-2000 kcal) that i have been at for the last month and a half.
My intensions are lowering bf not increasing size, but i don't know which approach is better