Obviously, i was not privy to the conversation between Dave and his physician. We only have one side of the story (Dave's). I'm not questioning Dave's interpretation of his office visit with the doc, but we all know there are 3 sides to every issue...my version, your version and the correct version.
If events occurred as Dave describes, i do believe the doc was wrong to divulge private information between him and his patient (who is an ADULT) to a third party without the consent of the patient. That being said, the actions of the doc DO NOT meet the threshold of malpractice in this circumstance.
I understand the nature of this board and the tendency for people of like cause to band together. However, what is at issue here is a doc with a patient who has ADMITTED possessing and using drugs without a prescription. I dont care who says what, the doctor had EVERY right to call the police right then and there if he was so inclined.
I recommended Dave drop the issue primarily because it dealt with AAS...illegally obtained AAS (he didnt have a script for its use). Secondly, the doc would not have lost any attempts at litigation. In fact, the case would probably have been dismissed even before it got to court. Thirdly, in THIS circumstance, this physician will NOT loose his license...wont even get a warning.
Everything comes back to the FACT that Dave admitted illegal activty to the doc and it may be in the medical chart. I dont think dave made a wise choice to confront the physician, but in the end, he did the right thing by moving on with his life.
If one decides to use AAS (which i dont condone, of course), i think the best way to find a doc is by word of mouth. The WORSE thing one can do is avoid check-ups and get into a situation like Tom Prince.
If events occurred as Dave describes, i do believe the doc was wrong to divulge private information between him and his patient (who is an ADULT) to a third party without the consent of the patient. That being said, the actions of the doc DO NOT meet the threshold of malpractice in this circumstance.
I understand the nature of this board and the tendency for people of like cause to band together. However, what is at issue here is a doc with a patient who has ADMITTED possessing and using drugs without a prescription. I dont care who says what, the doctor had EVERY right to call the police right then and there if he was so inclined.
I recommended Dave drop the issue primarily because it dealt with AAS...illegally obtained AAS (he didnt have a script for its use). Secondly, the doc would not have lost any attempts at litigation. In fact, the case would probably have been dismissed even before it got to court. Thirdly, in THIS circumstance, this physician will NOT loose his license...wont even get a warning.
Everything comes back to the FACT that Dave admitted illegal activty to the doc and it may be in the medical chart. I dont think dave made a wise choice to confront the physician, but in the end, he did the right thing by moving on with his life.
If one decides to use AAS (which i dont condone, of course), i think the best way to find a doc is by word of mouth. The WORSE thing one can do is avoid check-ups and get into a situation like Tom Prince.