i understand, that does seem like good idea maybe 200iu or 250iu hcg twice weekly with 15mg clomid daily?
Yeah, that sounds reasonable. I think the heavier the AAS dosages, then the more they will suppress natty test production & LH & FSH, so I think a sane ratio of HCG to AAS would be a 1:2 ratio.
For example, if a guy were running TRT in between cycles, he could use something like 100 mg testE & 50 IUs of HCG twice per week, then when cycling, he might try something like 250 mg of test E & 125 IUs of HCG twice per week.
If this didn't bring satisfactory results, then upping the HCG portion to a 1:1 ratio of AAS to HCG would likely do the job.
The reason I'm leaning toward trying to get by with smaller doses of HCG is because it serves a precious & irreplaceable purpose in the male body. I think we all can agree that our nuts are important. If we can agree on that, then I think we can also agree that desensitizing our balls to the benefits of HCG would be bad. Since desensitization has been shown to occur in much larger doses & over extended periods, we do have some leeway to wiggle around in, but I don't want my nuts being the ones that proved to the BBing world where the maximum safe long-term HCG dosage line was...
The way I figure it, if I can use extremely small doses of clomid & naltrexone to keep my pituitary gland & my nuts sensitised to HCG, then I will be able to get by with relatively small doses of HCG & also enjoy faster cycle recovery while also enjoying the perks of having fully functional testicles.
Sure I could just run TRT in between heavier AAS cycles with no HCG protection & watch helplessly as my nuts slowly shrivel up like raisins, but why should I do that? What have my nuts ever done wrong to deserve that kind of neglect?