So I got into a half assed argument today with one of my training partners about the comparative degrees of liver damage between orals that are typically considered "harsh" and those considered "gentle". In the end, we agreed that it was basically a speculative argument since neither one of us has regular liver function tests taken. I hope people can weigh in who have their livers monitored while on cycle and could compare the results from a cycle using a "harsh" oral vs a "gentle" one. If not I'm happy to hear the speculation too. The argument started because I was telling him how I just began my cycle today and that I was kick starting it with a combo of 20mg Dbol & 20 mg Halo per day for 4 weeks. He answered that he always wanted to try Halo but he didn't want to fuck up his liver. I reminded him that he usually uses 80-100mg of Anavar a day for a couple of months at a clip and he responded with "yeah bro, but it's only anavar." My thinking on this has always been to use the stronger and more effective orals but use them in low to moderate doses. First, let me say I'm not a big abuser of orals in the first place. I tend to only use them to kick start cycles with long esters and once in a blue moon I'll throw in some halo and dbol preworkout for a little extra kick in the ass to get through my toughest training days. It's not so much that I'm afraid of liver damage as it is that I just think the injectables do a better job in that most muscle and strength gained with orals is short lived. So the question is which do you think would do more damage to the liver in the example I gave. We'll keep the time element constant for comparison's sake and say 20mg Halo/20mg Dbol vs 80mg Anavar for 6 weeks. Which stresses the liver more? I figure all three are 17 alpha alkylated so one shouldn't be that much worse than the next.