J
jahras12
Guest
My question is, if he used synthol or escilene for years wouldnt there be some sort of abscesses or lumps on his tris when he got to a smaller size, or would it go away when he was a normal size? just curious
jahras12 said:My question is, if he used synthol or escilene for years wouldnt there be some sort of abscesses or lumps on his tris when he got to a smaller size, or would it go away when he was a normal size? just curious
jahras12 said:read it and now understand, thanks.
now another offtopic question big a in your seo article, why do you think gregg valentino has implants in his arms, why cant it all be seo oil? is it because it would dissapate too early? what if it is muscle that was added into the area like you said, could that be possible?
Vander_V said:So you think its was genetics , then why has he held 0 muscle since his retirement? i was 242 been off for almost 8 months and kept 233lbs and i wasnt even training for the last 12 weeks do to hernia operation, if its genetics thats great for him but for me well its gonna take me some hard ass work to get then like that or even near that i should say
Massive G said:I could write a volume on this but will keep it short.
Kevin has always "deflated" after a contest, since the 1991 JR nationals.
I have known the guy for years he stopped everything, the diet, growth agents, the training, the cardio, Ate junk and 2-3 meals a day, partied and drank alcohol, stays out late, and ran women etc.
The he would turn a switch and turn everything back on to a lifestyle training eating cardio in a more disciplined manner than Jay Cutler.
Although at the extreme ends of the spectrum I know but IMO why he is still healthy and happy today.
No disrespect Vander but you are hardly a Levrone so why are you comapring your triceps to him?
Anyway Kevin hardly EVER trained tricpes or delts after he built his core mass....
He didn't use any Synthol or Escilene, them damn tris were there way before Sythol was brought to the forefront by Chris Clark.
PEACE
SHOT* said:Bro he did everything he could to lose that muscle..its not that he just quit training and it fell off....he has the best genetics that i know of.
Eatbig2getbig said:When the term "genetics" is used you have to remember that it means more than just someones ability to get big. Levrone has great genetics in that he "responds" exceptionally well to gear. He also has very round muscle bellies that add to the illusion and his genetic potential. Some are very lucky with response to gear. I believe that Levrone simply resonds exceptionally well. He was known to take several months off of training when he worked on his music. He would decide to do a show and asctually grow into his stage condition. Going from something like 200 to 250 for a show in 4-5 months. I also believe that he pounded the escilene. One thing is for sure. He was a freak in his day, and could easily repeat this condition if he chose to do so.
Vander_V said:So you think its was genetics , then why has he held 0 muscle since his retirement? i was 242 been off for almost 8 months and kept 233lbs and i wasnt even training for the last 12 weeks do to hernia operation, if its genetics thats great for him but for me well its gonna take me some hard ass work to get then like that or even near that i should say