I've ran 2.0 twice with awesome results and 3.0 once with decent results. I was told I may have been overtraining when I was taking the 3.0 which is why I didn't see the same success with it. These products do contain legitimate steroids so all the same precautions need to be taken. Liver support and pct. I didn't take any ai and had no problems with gyno. Out of the 20 I put on I kept about 10lbs of the weight. I will add that when I did take these my diet wasn't the best due to lack of knowledge.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Dmz stand for dimethazine. Super dmz was a blend of superdrol and dmz.
2.0 is methylstenbolone and Dmz and they added alpha 1 (prohormone to m1t but active on his own) to 3.0
They are all strong as fuck imo.
Never used or will use any of them I care too much for my liver and cholesterol etc... to each their own.
DMZ 3.0 is the exact same forumation as 2.0, but with one additional steroid added to it, hence the name 3.0.
DMZ 2.0 contains: 10 mg Dimethazine, and 10 mg Methystenbolone
DMZ 3.0 contains: 10 mg Dimethazine, 10 mg Methylstenbolone, and 10 mg Alpha-1.
They are all strong as fuck imo.
Never used or will use any of them I care too much for my liver and cholesterol etc... to each their own.
I know what's in them. It took me a month to decide on what PH I was going to take. I was just sharing my experience with the OP. I spent a lot of time reading through every review and study done before taking.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Prohormones are steroids, they are strong and alot of them are toxic but will put pounds on you fast
Sent from my SPH-D600 using Tapatalk 2
What's everyones opinion about this versus Anadrol@100mgs/ed?
No offense, but if you knew what they were, why did you say "if you don't want to run AAS then I guess this is the next best thing?"
ALL of the compounds in this product are AAS--NOT ph's---and ALL of them are stronger muscle builders, per mg (as proven by legitimate medical research), than any traditional prescription steroid, including Dianabol and Anadrol.
There is a difference between actual muscle fiber and intramuscular water retention...and in every study ever done which compared these drugs against each other, the drugs in DMZ (any version) ALWAYS came out on top in terms of myotropic potency.
Multiple tests have been coducted going all the way back to the 60's, when drugs like Anadrol and Anavar were first being released. So, these are not "new" drugs by any means, but were around and known about as long as our traditional steroids. They just weren't produced as prescriptipon drugs...and the reason for this had NOTHING to do with toxicity or effectiveness, but simply because they did not exhiibit characteristic deemed ideal for the treatment of specific medical conditions. However, we are BBrs/strength athletes, so different rules apply.
Note: Dimethazine actually was a prescription drug in two different countries (Italy & Mexico), but has since been discontinued for lack of need (newer medical treatments have replaced AAS for most things).