Stewie
Featured Member / Verified Customer
Featured Member
Kilo Klub Member
Registered
Verified Customer
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2011
- Messages
- 5,771
Primarly the reasoning why hydrolyzed collagen is more efficiently assimilated vs non-hydrolyzed collagen. The Dalton (molecule weight) size is too large to permeate the intestinal lining from non-hydrolyzed collagen. The process of hydrolysis breaks down large intact collagen to smaller proteins for better assimilation. Then there's collagen tripeptide that purportedly has better assimilation, and allegedly has antiathroscorotic potential.I started using Knox gelatin on and off over 30 years ago. Then used bovine and marine collagen for over 10 years straight. Still wore out, damaged joints and tendons and had things replaced. and am a good 2 inches shorter then i was from all the cartilage wearing away in my joints and the discs in my back getting thinner. The dog i have now has used collagen all his life and he has the worst joints of any dog i have ever had. Seems the body can't absorb collagen as the molecule is to big. And the digestive system chops it up into aminos like other proteins for the most part. Some studies point to collagen II having some benefit.
I do agree, gelatin with vitamin C would be more cost effective.
I'd like to hope so. At 60 y/o I have no facial wrinkles, jowls or droopy neck like most individuals my age. I do have nasolabial folds and one frown line from years of squinting. All of this could be more so related to my healthy lifestyle and not specific to collagen supplements. Who knows?Do you feel it helps? Think I’ll probably try supplementing some for a while.













































































