- Joined
- Jun 11, 2012
- Messages
- 223
What i have noticed in recent years is the tendency for trainers to always do what's "new and different" with clients no matter what their level of experience/fitness (and not necessarly what works best and is the safest).
Everything is done on one leg, or done sitting or lying on an excercise ball are typical examples.
The thing I have come to realize is not everyone is training to be huge or ripped. Some people are training for functionality, Some people to correct muscle imbalances, some people it is sport specific etc.
I will give you an example, If you ask a bodybuilder what is the best way to develop Glutes and almost everyone will say squats or stiff leg deadlifts, but if you as a Physical therapist that they will teach you lot of stuff most of us would consider weird or boring like glue bridges, clams, etc. I think it is not always about hypertrophy but correct activation and functionality too.
Now do I think every personal trainer is knowledgeable about this. I doubt it.
But there is a lot of training facilities (For Eg. Eric Cressey training academy) where the training is more for athletes not for "bodybuilding." They actually probably know and understand more about strength and conditioning than the average bodybuilder on this board. Just cause they don't do conventional lifts doesnt mean that they are dumb assess.
Just my opinion
Last edited: