- Joined
- Mar 6, 2009
- Messages
- 26,210
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3482394/
Effect of GW and AICAR on muscle weight and behavioral activity measures
The average body mass of the treated mice was significantly higher than that of vehicle-treated mice (Figure (Figure2A).2A). Treatments increased the body mass by ~10% (GW, 9.2%; AICAR, 11.3%; GW&AICAR, 10.63%). A general increase in the weight of the EDL, gastrocnemius, quadriceps, soleus, and TA muscles was found in the drug-treated groups (statistically significant for the quadriceps (GW, +12.7%; AICAR, +14.6% ; GW&AICAR, 13.7%) (Figure (Figure2B)2B) and soleus (GW, +14.3%; AICAR, +17.4%) (Figure (Figure2C).2C). Interestingly, abdominal fat was decreased in response to all three treatments (Figure (Figure2D),2D), and the decrease was statistically significant for both single-treatment groups.
Grip strength and open-field animal activity tests were performed before and after drug treatment. We found a significant increase in forelimb grip strength in the GW501516-treated and combination-treatment groups (Figure (Figure2E,F).2E,F). The increase in hind limb grip strength was significant for all three treatments (Figure (Figure2G).2G). Since these drugs influenced body weight, we normalized data to body weight. Both forelimb and hind limb grip strength increased significantly with GW501516 (+19%, +13%, respectively) and combination treatment (+25%, +13%, respectively) (Figure (Figure2F).2F). Behavioral activity measures did not significantly change for the single treatments but the combination treatment group showed significantly increased movement time (89%) (Figure (Figure2I)2I) and decreased rest time (Figure (Figure2J),2J), suggesting an overall beneficial effect on these parameters.
Effect of GW and AICAR on muscle weight and behavioral activity measures
The average body mass of the treated mice was significantly higher than that of vehicle-treated mice (Figure (Figure2A).2A). Treatments increased the body mass by ~10% (GW, 9.2%; AICAR, 11.3%; GW&AICAR, 10.63%). A general increase in the weight of the EDL, gastrocnemius, quadriceps, soleus, and TA muscles was found in the drug-treated groups (statistically significant for the quadriceps (GW, +12.7%; AICAR, +14.6% ; GW&AICAR, 13.7%) (Figure (Figure2B)2B) and soleus (GW, +14.3%; AICAR, +17.4%) (Figure (Figure2C).2C). Interestingly, abdominal fat was decreased in response to all three treatments (Figure (Figure2D),2D), and the decrease was statistically significant for both single-treatment groups.
Grip strength and open-field animal activity tests were performed before and after drug treatment. We found a significant increase in forelimb grip strength in the GW501516-treated and combination-treatment groups (Figure (Figure2E,F).2E,F). The increase in hind limb grip strength was significant for all three treatments (Figure (Figure2G).2G). Since these drugs influenced body weight, we normalized data to body weight. Both forelimb and hind limb grip strength increased significantly with GW501516 (+19%, +13%, respectively) and combination treatment (+25%, +13%, respectively) (Figure (Figure2F).2F). Behavioral activity measures did not significantly change for the single treatments but the combination treatment group showed significantly increased movement time (89%) (Figure (Figure2I)2I) and decreased rest time (Figure (Figure2J),2J), suggesting an overall beneficial effect on these parameters.