- Joined
- Jan 15, 2011
- Messages
- 13,132
Sounds like a basic topic, but I came across a Mike Arnold post from a while ago with the following,
"Many falsely believe that shorter esters are "stronger" because they contain more drug per mg, but this is actually false. Research shows that longer esters provide a greater increase in protein synthess, per mg, whether it be test, nandrolone, or tren.
I don't remember the exact numbers now, but one study demonstrated this with testosterone, when a 200 mg injection of test cyp increased protein synthesis somewhere around 270%, while an equivalent dose of test prop increased protein syntheis about 190%. Similar studies have been done over the decades, with researchers coming to the same conclusions each time."
I have always thought short esters like prop were stronger than longer esters like enanthate and cyp. I have also never seen the research that he speaks of. What does everyone think?
"Many falsely believe that shorter esters are "stronger" because they contain more drug per mg, but this is actually false. Research shows that longer esters provide a greater increase in protein synthess, per mg, whether it be test, nandrolone, or tren.
I don't remember the exact numbers now, but one study demonstrated this with testosterone, when a 200 mg injection of test cyp increased protein synthesis somewhere around 270%, while an equivalent dose of test prop increased protein syntheis about 190%. Similar studies have been done over the decades, with researchers coming to the same conclusions each time."
I have always thought short esters like prop were stronger than longer esters like enanthate and cyp. I have also never seen the research that he speaks of. What does everyone think?