For all you R.Coleman fans

[Nssca]

No question in my mind Arnold rules...

 

[JonnyO]

Lay the pipe down bro. Arnold cant touch Ronnie but we all have our own personal favorites.

 

[Jrflex10er]

lol come on man....2 of arnold's legs equals one of ronnie's. No contest arnold doesn't place in top 10 these days. But I'm a fan of Hugeness over shape....I like art more than arnold.

 

[BigBoyJ]

I prefer Arnold's look over Ronnie's too. Arnold just looks more aesthetic. Ronnie looks like a blimp.

 

[BigBoyJ]

By the way, Ronnie obviously blows Arnold away in leg size, but look at the difference in conditioning.

 

[Jrflex10er]

By the way, Ronnie obviously blows Arnold away in leg size, but look at the difference in conditioning.

Indeed...I agree with you on that.

 

[TooPowerful4u]

thats kinda unfair comparison pix of choice. The coleman one is a very shitty one of him, the arnie one is prolly his best, and coleman still wins. Use this one . . .

 

[TooPowerful4u]

now lets turn them around lol (now im being completly unfair there isnt even a comparison)

 

[TooPowerful4u]

had to put this in, its just sick

 

[BigBoyJ]

Comparison,

Biceps- Arnold wins
Pecs- Arnold
Back- Coleman
Waist- Arnold
Quads- Coleman for size, Arnold for conditioning
Calves- Hard to tell from this pic, but from other pics, I'd say it's draw.


Overall winner-Arnold

 

[Reload]

Arnold was incredible for his day but there really is no comparing the two.

 

[Jrflex10er]

now lets turn them around lol (now im being completly unfair there isnt even a comparison)

I thought that was a bad pic of ronnie too...now that you have brought these up ronnie beat arnold in everything. lol

 

[BCC]

In a true side to side comparison I'd have to say Arnold would be dwarfed. He's what? 235 pounds there. Ronnie's carrying a nice 280 something and 2-3 inches shorter. I'm sorry, but he would look far, far larger in an accurately scaled depiction.

 

[BigBoyJ]

Ronnie's just bigger, that's it. So what? He took about a thousand times more drugs than Arnold, of course he's gonna be bigger. For shape, symmetry and overall genetics, Arnold kills him. It isn't all about size. And I'm not just saying that because of the size of my weiner.

 

[BCC]

I don't think it's fair to speculate "how many more drugs" Ronnie has used unless you really know.

Arnold was at the top of the game in his day and I think it's fair to say he would do or take whatever it took to get and remain there.

 

[rAJJIN]

Lol

I think the back shot says it all.

Arnold Was great and way ahead of his time. Maybe Just Maybe if he were todays bodybuilder it would be differant.
But no theres no comparison when you put a 70`s arnold against a 2000
RonnieColeman. Shit Ronnie still gets better every year, I think we have still yet to see his best.

Im a fan of Huge muscles myself... Small waist you see everywhere..
300lb Men like Dorian,Coleman, are Just In-human!
The "model" look is ok and sure probably healthier etc.
But I say bring out the freaks and Mass monsters. IMO

 

[moose]

Bodybuilding is not all about size in my opinion...so, that being said....Arnold's physique wins. I guess it just depends on your definition of bodybuilding. It's all in the eyes of the beholder.

 

[Nssca]

another one

 

[Nssca]

again

 

[Jrflex10er]

I love Dorain's front double bi....One of my all time favorite