My out look is this. Anti bodies or not it's Irrelevant really. Anything you put in your body over a course of time, be it gear, caffeine, alcohol gh whatever your body will find a way to adapt and desensitise is just the way it is.
Not necessarily. Let me give you an example. Say you have hypothyroidism as many people do. People are then prescribed thyroid hormones and most people once they find the right dosage are able to stay on the same dosage long term without losing effectiveness. Why doesn't their body adapt and need continually changing higher dosages? Why can't GH be same way? Also let me add there are a small fraction of people who do develop thyroid antibodies and the medication doesn't work. Let me take this a step further; is it possible that GH works the same way and that a small subset of people do develop antibodies and that is why we we do here some of these stories but it is not the norm. My guess is this may in fact be whats happening.
Not necessarily. Let me give you an example. Say you have hypothyroidism as many people do. People are then prescribed thyroid hormones and most people once they find the right dosage are able to stay on the same dosage long term without losing effectiveness. Why doesn't their body adapt and need continually changing higher dosages? Why can't GH be same way? Also let me add there are a small fraction of people who do develop thyroid antibodies and the medication doesn't work. Let me take this a step further; is it possible that GH works the same way and that a small subset of people do develop antibodies and that is why we we do here some of these stories but it is not the norm. My guess is this may in fact be whats happening.
Correct, but antibody development becomes a bigger problem when drugs are not bioidentical. It's very easy to make thyroid hormone bioidentical. GH not so much. Much more complex. Any drug that is very similar to the natural hormone but not identical will have some degree of antibody development.
My thyroid has remained stable over the years; my free T3 is 3.0 which is right in the middle of the normal range and my TSH 1.13. I did my free T4 this time for the first time and it was .81 which is low as the reference range starts at .82. However, T4 is inactive and free T3 is main thing I am looking at with thyroid, so as long as free T3 is normal it really doesn't matter how its getting there(and no I haven't supplemented with thyroid in many many years; don't see a need to as long as T3 is normal and I don't have any symptoms).
This thread has left me even more confused, unfortunately. At least we are making progress trying to get to the bottom of this.
the question is why does GH kick ass when you first take it then not so much?
possible answers: antibody build up, thyroid affecting IGF conversion??
testing: guy are now getting serum and IGF levels AND thyroid at beginning of therapy , during and and end of therapy to compile data and see if we can come up with any answers.
the question is why does GH kick ass when you first take it then not so much?
possible answers: antibody build up, thyroid affecting IGF conversion??
testing: guy are now getting serum and IGF levels AND thyroid at beginning of therapy , during and and end of therapy to compile data and see if we can come up with any answers.
ideo dynamic response
and that explains why I have serum tests that are equal and IGF levels that decline with time on.
what about Inducing negative feedback from constant use. because GH not working as good any longer can also be a result of negative feedback and not just antibodies unless your saying anybodies are same as negative feedback but their two different things. So I think two things can happen as result of exogenous GH use.
Agreed, the body adapting and returning to homeostasis is different than the body developing an immune response and generating antibodies.