- Joined
- Nov 30, 2004
- Messages
- 784
This is not the first place i go for information. I have talked to the surgeon, he doesn't say anything. Any side effects i have had he seems to put off on my GP to solve. And probably is worried i will blame the surgery and sue him maybe. And my GP says anesthesia can have that effect to some degree for 3 months, which i knew from my own reading. But it has been about 11 weeks and it is not getting better. It is not high enough to get many Dr's to worried. But i am looking long term and am proactive myself. I feel BP and glucose levels are 2 things that should be tracked and dealt with as soon as possible. I see that some of the antibiotics can effect BP but i quite them a while ago. And the DR's were not to up on that.
We usually don't get concerned until the systolic reaches and remains at > 180 mm Hg or DBP > 120 mm Hg (hypertensive urgency) for several straight minutes without abatement. Then you push an anti-HTN agent such as IV Labetalol, Nicardipine, Hydralazine, Enalaprilat, etc. depending on the pt's existing co-morbidities. Some clinicians prefer to use Oral forms of anti-HTN meds for hypertensive urgencies but the onset of action can vary significantly. Thus, IV is better, IMO, simply b/c of it's fast onset of action and ease of titration.
Then you have hypertensive crises (emergencies) where the SBP > 220 and/or the DBP > 120. Same rules apply with regards to meds used but you have less time to act. You must also lower the BP slowly at ~20-25% in the span of mins to two hours. If you lower it too fast, you can cause an ischemic stroke which last I check is no bueno.