Higher test versus lower tren for overall health?

[syntherolman]

Looking to get opinions on which you believe is safer on the body when used long term and why: 1000 mgs of test per week or 200 mgs of tren per week?

 

[syntherolman]

I think 200 mgs of tren per week may be harder on the heart and immune system than 1000 mgs of test since it has a negative impact on cardio function and sleep patterns.

 

[SAGE74]

This is the best question I've ever seen on this board! If I had to guess because there really are very few emperical studies done on either drug, I think it might be as wash. I take 100mg/tren and get nasty sides, but 1000 mg/test I've only gone that high once and felt like shit. Good question!

 

[syntherolman]

This is the best question I've ever seen on this board! If I had to guess because there really are very few emperical studies done on either drug, I think it might be as wash. I take 100mg/tren and get nasty sides, but 1000 mg/test I've only gone that high once and felt like shit. Good question!

Yeah I feel likes it's one of the most vital questions since most of us fall into these categories. I am hoping to get some proffesional discussion concerning this topic.

Thanks gentlemen!

 

[TT]

I ran different AAS including test at 1g for 8 months and my bloods were more or less acceptable. But when I ran Tren even as low as 175mg/week my blood tests look horrible. Granted, I wasn't doing Tren by itself but stacked with something. That said, I loved the results and consider Tren the best there is if one has a lot of health to spare.

 

[syntherolman]

I ran different AAS including test at 1g for 8 months and my bloods were more or less acceptable. But when I ran Tren even as low as 175mg/week my blood tests look horrible. Granted, I wasn't doing Tren by itself but stacked with something. That said, I loved the results and consider Tren the best there is if one has a lot of health to spare.

Did the tren screw with your cholesterol levels?

 

[jrock00123]

I'm on 100 test, 300 mast, 200 tren. Just got bloods and HDL was 14. I have really focused hard on every dietary and supplement to help with low HDL with no luck. I love tren, but this may be my last run.

I'd like to find a simple cycle that is cholesterol friendly. I only care about HDL; LDL is meaningless.

Great question OP

 

[syntherolman]

I'm on 100 test, 300 mast, 200 tren. Just got bloods and HDL was 14. I have really focused hard on every dietary and supplement to help with low HDL with no luck. I love tren, but this may be my last run.

I'd like to find a simple cycle that is cholesterol friendly. I only care about HDL; LDL is meaningless.

Great question OP

What's your HDL when running test without tren?

 

[jrock00123]

On TRT it is around 40. It's been over 50 before I started using AAS.

 

[ATLien]

I'm on 100 test, 300 mast, 200 tren. Just got bloods and HDL was 14. I have really focused hard on every dietary and supplement to help with low HDL with no luck. I love tren, but this may be my last run.

I'd like to find a simple cycle that is cholesterol friendly. I only care about HDL; LDL is meaningless.

Great question OP

what if you drop the tren and add var or tbol instead?

 

[TT]

Did the tren screw with your cholesterol levels?

Yes. Every time I ran Tren it trashed my HDL. Still loved the results though

 

[Benson81]

Looking to get opinions on which you believe is safer on the body when used long term and why: 1000 mgs of test per week or 200 mgs of tren per week?

I would say test. Tren is 5x stronger than test so think bout that. The reason why most people cant stay on it long. Test u can stay on.

 

[Benson81]

I mean the results of tren are amazing but super harsh. Don't know about u guys but the sides kill me

 

[vegas83]

ummmmm, neither are remotely close to "safe" long term.

 

[tomrock1]

You dont need high dose of anything. Eat/ workout right