- Joined
- Apr 5, 2015
- Messages
- 2,567
a thread like this came up long time ago. i think phil hernon was on the board then.
if i remember right we all kinda agreed steroids will get ya 70% of ur growth. gh another 10-15% and add slin for another 10-15% in terms of what is responsible for total gains. i know silly to nail it down to numbers like that but u get the idea.
if i were on a budget and not trying to be a pro i'd skip the gh.
hell that IS what i do lol
when i competed i couldnt afford gh but did use slin and pretty hefty doses so i dont think i was missing much... gh imo is a finnishing touch on muscle gain. whatever u gain w roids u can squeeze out a lil bit more gains by adding gh (and slin)
There was a thread slo about Dusty Hanshaw and kinda his before and after look once he added gh and slin. it DEF changed his look and added size but at what cost..... i believe Doggcrapp said he prefered Dustys non gh look.
if i remember right we all kinda agreed steroids will get ya 70% of ur growth. gh another 10-15% and add slin for another 10-15% in terms of what is responsible for total gains. i know silly to nail it down to numbers like that but u get the idea.
if i were on a budget and not trying to be a pro i'd skip the gh.
hell that IS what i do lol
when i competed i couldnt afford gh but did use slin and pretty hefty doses so i dont think i was missing much... gh imo is a finnishing touch on muscle gain. whatever u gain w roids u can squeeze out a lil bit more gains by adding gh (and slin)
There was a thread slo about Dusty Hanshaw and kinda his before and after look once he added gh and slin. it DEF changed his look and added size but at what cost..... i believe Doggcrapp said he prefered Dustys non gh look.