- Joined
- Sep 29, 2013
- Messages
- 289
So I've been reading up on IGF-1 LR3 and the general consensus is a cycle about 40-50 days on average then time off and then cycle again.
HGH obviously is a minimum of a 6 months cycle to get the muscle building/hyperplasia benefits.
Since HGH produces its effects via IGF-1 produced from the liver and HGH is recommended for 6+ months, basically meaning elevated IGF-1 levels for 6+ months, why is it that an IGF-1 ONLY cycle is limited to 40-50 days with time off afterwards?
Doesn't make sense to me since with HGH, IGF-1 levels are elevated 6+ months, why cant u rock IGF-1 ONLY for 3/4+ months?
Obviously HGH is the better option and IGF-1 is the poor mans GH but just wondering about this discrepancy. Is it bro science about IGF-1 cycle length or just what one person said years ago and everyone seems to parrot it and think thats the norm without scientific evidence?
Info from experienced/educated members would be much appreciated.
Thanks
HGH obviously is a minimum of a 6 months cycle to get the muscle building/hyperplasia benefits.
Since HGH produces its effects via IGF-1 produced from the liver and HGH is recommended for 6+ months, basically meaning elevated IGF-1 levels for 6+ months, why is it that an IGF-1 ONLY cycle is limited to 40-50 days with time off afterwards?
Doesn't make sense to me since with HGH, IGF-1 levels are elevated 6+ months, why cant u rock IGF-1 ONLY for 3/4+ months?
Obviously HGH is the better option and IGF-1 is the poor mans GH but just wondering about this discrepancy. Is it bro science about IGF-1 cycle length or just what one person said years ago and everyone seems to parrot it and think thats the norm without scientific evidence?
Info from experienced/educated members would be much appreciated.
Thanks
Last edited: