another thing,I have heard that Igf-1 is ggod for pct.
but...
i have also heard that igf-1 need to be taken in a anabolic environment (the opposite of pct) with lots of androgen
i am currenly coming to the end of a cycle and considering igf for pct.
thoughts on this?
-1st response i got-
It works like this:
"IGF-1 induces differentiation of muscle stem cells to produce hyperplasia, the creation of completely new muscle fibers. These are immature fibers that will need some time to grow and mature. A cycle of AAS can speed this process up and lead to quicker hypertrophy of the new muscle fibers.
However, the creation of new muscle fibers takes some time in itself and immediate use of IGF with a short cycle of AAS may not be too synergistic as you have not had enough time to have a sufficient amount of hyperplasia to take advantage of the anabolic state. If you do short cycles like 4-6 weeks, you will probably not have much synergy. In this scenario, IGF would most likely benefit from the next AAS cycle you do down the road after you finish the IGF cycle so you might as well save the IGF for PCT here since it will definitely help keep gains (remember IGF levels are quite low after a cycle).
A longer cycle like 12+ weeks is better. In such a cycle many use IGF right at the beginning and again in PCT since there is sufficient break in between the IGF runs. This is the perfect combination IMO.
If you do short 4 week PH runs, I would not waste doing it along side IGF. I would do the IGF in PCT, gain some new immature fibers, keep the gains from the cycle, and then hit the Anabolics (next cycle down the road)to target the most of the new fibers.
Hope I did not drag this out to much. Tired"
- my response-
thats the way i understood it, that becasue of the way IGF works, it works regardless and is not affected by other factors. but ist just that along with my above post, grunt also states in this thread that it would be a waste if running in a big calorie deficit (non anabolic state).
by the way, this is my first cycle and i will not run any more steroid cycles after this, so the purpose of IGF would be to keep gains in pct and possibly build more muscle during after this with the new fibres. (is this possible when training naturally and not hitting the juice?).
thanks for response
any reply on the shake during workout post above?
cheers
but...
i have also heard that igf-1 need to be taken in a anabolic environment (the opposite of pct) with lots of androgen
i am currenly coming to the end of a cycle and considering igf for pct.
thoughts on this?
-1st response i got-
It works like this:
"IGF-1 induces differentiation of muscle stem cells to produce hyperplasia, the creation of completely new muscle fibers. These are immature fibers that will need some time to grow and mature. A cycle of AAS can speed this process up and lead to quicker hypertrophy of the new muscle fibers.
However, the creation of new muscle fibers takes some time in itself and immediate use of IGF with a short cycle of AAS may not be too synergistic as you have not had enough time to have a sufficient amount of hyperplasia to take advantage of the anabolic state. If you do short cycles like 4-6 weeks, you will probably not have much synergy. In this scenario, IGF would most likely benefit from the next AAS cycle you do down the road after you finish the IGF cycle so you might as well save the IGF for PCT here since it will definitely help keep gains (remember IGF levels are quite low after a cycle).
A longer cycle like 12+ weeks is better. In such a cycle many use IGF right at the beginning and again in PCT since there is sufficient break in between the IGF runs. This is the perfect combination IMO.
If you do short 4 week PH runs, I would not waste doing it along side IGF. I would do the IGF in PCT, gain some new immature fibers, keep the gains from the cycle, and then hit the Anabolics (next cycle down the road)to target the most of the new fibers.
Hope I did not drag this out to much. Tired"
- my response-
thats the way i understood it, that becasue of the way IGF works, it works regardless and is not affected by other factors. but ist just that along with my above post, grunt also states in this thread that it would be a waste if running in a big calorie deficit (non anabolic state).
by the way, this is my first cycle and i will not run any more steroid cycles after this, so the purpose of IGF would be to keep gains in pct and possibly build more muscle during after this with the new fibres. (is this possible when training naturally and not hitting the juice?).
thanks for response
any reply on the shake during workout post above?
cheers