In my opinion they definitely did although I like oral form as well.Did the inject give any better benefit vs oral
If he were my client that's what he would be onPrimo might be what you want
Probably due to high solvent content more than anything else.The winsrol amps I used to take many years ago didnt cause any lingering pain and were my very favorite aas. The ug lab inj win have been painful in my experience though.i think it was oil based compared to the water based amps.
I’ve used all 3 and there is no way in hell I’d ever call TNE+winny a poor GH. For me at least, TNE+Winstrol is far more potent at practically everything aesthetically snd performance based than GH.Back in the day we used winny and test suspension same syringe. Poor mans gh
I'd say between 10-14% BF I would choose Winstrol. Anything under 10% mast just really makes your physique ridiculous
Yes, from my experience and friendsDid the inject give any better benefit vs oral
I personally would not want to run something I would worry about the entire time I was on it but thats just me.I want to run water base injectable winstrol again. It was my first cycle 20 years ago and I remember amazing results. I have found some on a sponsor here that I like. I’m worried about the infection chance of injecting water base gear. Just wanting to reach out and get you guys opinion that if it comes from one of the more popular sponsors I should be good?
What was the mg/ml of your injectable winny in oil? I’m asking bc I’m thinking about making some but can’t decide 50 mg or 100 mg/ml. I’m hoping that’s at 100mg/ml you tookI've used a few injectable winstrols (oil) and it is def much stronger than oral mg for mg, but the PIP is something that shouldn't be overlooked. Im not one to complain about a little pain but it got pretty annoying to say the least after a while. I'm told water based is even worse. Can't imagine.
For that fact alone, I'd opt for mast.