- Joined
- Nov 28, 2023
- Messages
- 935
Thanks man! I try to mix it up but really it just stems from my own curiosity trying to glean info from the great lifters we have here.Love your training threads BTW!
I also count rp as 3 sets. I find it fascinating that rp is so affective at increasing strength...because it is the complete opposite of 5x5 , where you hit the same movement more frequently but not to failure. Both are linear progression and work well. Perhaps the reason rp works so well isn't rp itself but the overall structure of dc training where you rotate lifts and hit every major muscle 1.5x a week (2 way split) with relatively low volume and brutal intensity?
Another one id like to hear people's thoughts on is giant sets (milos)
Guy a
3 sets ohp
3 sets upright rows
3 sets side lateral raises
3 sets cable y raises
Guy b
Ohp )upright row) lateral raise) y raise
4 exercise one after another minimal rest, wait 2 minutes then do 2 more rounds
Both dudes do same volume, 12 sets, same exercises...who grows more? Guy A will probably progression faster in weight used. Guy b will get it done quicker probably get a better pump, maybe more sarcoplasmic hypertrophy if you believe it happens.
Guy b has the advantage of getting done those 12 sets quicker so can probably do 2 more exercises before Guy A finishes with his 12 sets so he can jack up volume.
People that train with Milos love it but I wonder it if it along the lines of more work for the sake of more work. Like your example... could the same progress be made without the giant sets. Or as Luki mentions below are all those giants sets and the extreme demand just tapping recovery? I personally never liked super sets or giant sets because after each round the weights seem to be drastically different for each exercise. Like if I bench 135x10 on the first set of the first exercise but then do 3 more moves in then giant set... when I come back to the next round that 135x10 might be 135x4 or I need to change the weight but then the next 3 moves are all effected. Blah blah. I think too much calculating when I am huffing and puffing lol.
Right now I almost don’t use them at all. Maybe sometimes in a few exercises that I tolerate well, like leg curl or leg extension, but generally I prefer to just do one extra simple, classic set close to failure.
Intensifiers are good, but when you get older, they often don’t bring anything positive. They just make recovery longer, because they hit the nervous system hard, and they can also beat up your tendons and ligaments. And for me this is key now, because I’m much older.
I really use intensifiers only when I travel, when I can’t do a normal workout. Like in a hotel gym with limited equipment, and I need to train faster. Then I use supersets, combo sets, drop sets, and anything that comes to my mind.
One thing I still use sometimes is rest-pause. For example on leg press: I do a heavy set for 8–10 reps. I’m at rep 8 and I feel I have maybe 1–2 reps left, but if I push them straight, my form and tempo will break. So I prefer rest-pause: I rest around 20 seconds, do 2 more reps, rest 10–20 seconds, and do 1–2 more reps again.
This way, instead of doing 9 sloppy reps, I do 11–12 reps with much better quality, and all of them are very close to failure.
About intervals I never do them. I only do LISS. I do a lot of steps, very low heart rate work, and it works great for me. I really regret not doing this when I was competing.
Super interesting... 2 SHW that are super strong and 2 different approaches as I know Dave loves his intensifiers. I think anecdotally we see that they work... too many DC/Mountain Dog success stories to dispute. Could those guys have made the same progress with straight sets? I dont know. I think Luki hit it on the head at least for me... the CNS recovery. I would use them as much as I can as long as I can recover. I think at 43 I definitely cannot recover like I did 10 years ago.CV health is the main reason- I think it’s a major part of why I’m healthy at SHW size.
Also conditioning for leg and back training- i never get gassed before my quads, lats, etc actually fail.
Definitely feel a body comp and nutrient partitioning benefit. Ie body comp is better with HIIT and a bit more food than if I just dropped both.
As for HIIT... I dont really recall many if any SHW doing HIIT. I am not exactly friends with dozens of SHW competitors though so take my experience for what it is worth. I dont think I need more than steps to keep bodyfat at bay. I am fortunate in that regard. LISS definitely seems to help with appetite and general well being feeling. I just wonder if I can get a little more CV healthy while not tapping the previously mentioned recovery impact. And honestly I wonder if a lot of guys avoid HIIT because it just sucks to do... me included.
I guess only 1 way to find out...











































































