- Joined
- Sep 6, 2008
- Messages
- 3,284
Hey mate, do you keep any of the look you gained from GH when you come off it?
For the most part, yes.
The leaness will go, and I will loose a little "pop" to the muscle.
Hey mate, do you keep any of the look you gained from GH when you come off it?
so only 3 times per week u take HGH? did u try any other protocol? like ED or EODI was always in decent shape when I went into GH cycles.
My theory was GH was about the last thing in the toolkit to add.
Always training -> diet -> AAS -> GH -> insulin. I never move the drugs unless everything else is 100%.
I'm not saying that t preach, just for me I didn't want to waste $, and I want to make sure my progress is for real and something that can be quantified, measured, and repeated.
I run 5-10iu M/W/F.
My first few runs were 10iu, I later found I looked 90% the same at 5iu, so I did that.
Last two times I ran it just during contest prep, same schedule/dosage.
From my first usage, I found that fairly quickly my muscles rounded out and became more "3D" looking while bodyfat dropped.
I posted about this more that ten years ago here but cannot find the post right now.
so only 3 times per week u take HGH? did u try any other protocol? like ED or EOD
i also did 5 on 2 off and now i do EOD,my insulin sensitivity is better this way and less water retention...i will try also like u do 5iu MWFI did M->F for a while while in prep, but found no significant advantage so went back to MWF.
For the most part, yes.
The leaness will go, and I will loose a little "pop" to the muscle.
Its not anabolicOh okay I read it wrong. I thought it was one part lean body mass one part water. I still think it has anabolic affects as well. I'm patiently waiting for a study as little slice described lol.
I'm assuming the 31% of "cell mass" gained would include glycogen?
There is almost 0% chance of any study being done on HGH's impact on the heart with short or long-term use, at replacement doses or bodybuilding doses. It's been around for decades and is more regulated now than ever. If the study hasn't been done yet, it almost certainly never will be.
I did M->F for a while while in prep, but found no significant advantage so went back to MWF.
Therapeutic doses of GH are well tolerated and in the same realm of bb dosages. If there was concrete correlation between heart dysfunction and GH therapy it would likely have been noted in decades of clinical trial. It's also important to note that growth hormone deficiency usually goes hand and hand with hypogonadism, which are individuals also at a high risk for cardiac issues. I believe cardiac remodeling is certainly possible with rHGH use though.
Random thought: if a low/therapeutic amount of HGH increases Free T3, I'd think this could be beneficial for the heart for a number of people, since low FT3 is linked to cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. I know I've seen a study somewhere that showed HGH helped patients with heart failure once.
It's also been shown that HGH regenerated the thymus (used along with Metformin, DHEA, and Zinc in the study) and reversed biological aging by two years in all the people they enrolled in a small study last year. That was a big surprise.
I remeber this NH
Maybe your remember doses for GH , metformin,dhea and zinc ?
The study used doses of
HGH was 0.015mg/kg of body weight 3-4x per week (no idea how they decided on doing it like this)
500mg Metformin daily
50mg Zinc daily
50mg DHEA daily
This was one of the first myths I dispelled for myself many years ago when I actually started using GH. Does not take months, as was preached, to see the benefits.I'll just chime in here because IME it's incorrect to think one must run GH for a long time to see results. I've never run it more that 8 weeks or so, and my improvements were significant.