Braven said:
She has made a choice in life and has worked hard to get the physique that she has. Yes many people may not find her sexually atractive but then there's also many people that dont think male BBs are sexually atractive either, but that's not why you compete...is it?
I think as a BBer she looks amazing and deserves alot of credit for getting where she is!
I disagree about the
MAKING A CHOICE part. Let me explain:
Most women bodybuilders don't start out doing test/tren/winny in their first year of training. No, they start natural just like everyone else, then they get into first a figure then fitness kind of shape and they want to take it to the next level. They don't have a Gavin Kane or Grunt76 at their disposal to guide them effectively. All they have is the local meatheads. What is the first steroid they are often steered towards? Winny. Sometimes Var if they are very lucky but that doesn't matter very much because pretty early on they start taking winny. And women love it because it is ANDROGENIC.
Then imperceptibly, gradually, their face changes. Not hugely mind you, just a little and they are still cute. She looks hard and buff, but she can't really compette in fitness because most likely she does not have the superb athletics background needed to really shine into that. So they want to take it to the next level. More androgens, and the deed is done. They will bear the mark forever. Then after they are thoroughly virilized, do they get to a high enough level to warrant the attention of a honest and knowledgeable trainer and chemical enhancement expert, who will guide her in using the peptides. But by that time, she wears a manly face. She never CHOSE to have a manly face. It just happened gradually over the years as an unavoidable side-effect of heavy AAS use. All because peptides are considered a "more advanced" kind of chemical enhancement and most meatheads don't have the knowledge.
RSR34 said:
Great Reply. I agree totally. Interesting about the Superdrol. I've seen the A/A ratios, but a lot of people seem to feel it IS fairly androgenic (for women). What do you think? And what about Primobolan. Is it a "perhaps" due to it's structure from DHT? Please elaborate if you have time.
Thank you. I think people THINK superdrol is androgenic because of the leanness of gains. It almost behaves like a hardening agent like winny, tren or masteron because it doesn't aromatize and has such a huge a great glycogen-storing push, that all the water goes into the muscles, leaving a dry, cut, hard and pumped physique.
I know some ladies who did superbly on 2.5 to 5mg of superdrol a day. Even 5mg gave no facial virilization, but in one case a slight and temporary voice croak, which was corrected by reducing to 4mg. Think about that. 5mg of SD a day is a quarter of what a 200lb male will take. Few people need even 30mg. So pound per pound, that is nearly HALF the male dosage. Of course, anavar doses do get close to that, proportionately speaking, but anavar is a LOT less potent than superdrol. And it isn't like the ladies have too many choices to begin with, so adding just ONE option is a very good thing. More data will be needed with the ladies running superdrol. I know of only 4 cases, all of whom loved it.
And yes primo is a "perhaps" because it depends on many factors. It is pretty borderline in my experience.