This is a highly individual choice where genetics actually play a pretty big role. With people who don't know or can't figure out what works best for them, being moderate with all 3 macros is not a bad idea. There just isn't a need to be extreme.
I dropped 45 pounds and easily maintained over the last 8 months on 2,000 calorie, 300 protein, 150 carbs, 40 fat.
My trick is I don’t cut calories to burn fat, I increase my exercise. If I want to burn 1 pound a week, I do an extra 500 calories of exercise daily. If I want to lose 2 pounds a week, I do 1000 calories of exercise daily. If I don’t work out at all for a week or a month, my weight stays the same and I don’t gain it back because my caloric intake is fixed at my BMR.
This is what I’m sticking to until the box goes in to the ground. The diet yo-yo gets really old after a while.
what do you weigh now?? how tall and what body fat are you at? what is your age?
How did you burn 1k extra calories a day?? THats a lot of heavy intense cardio for 90 ish minutes..
Not at all. No one approach is best. Why fuck about with low carb if you respond well to carbs and enjoy eating them. Better mood, better workouts and better fat loss for me with high carb. Others will be the opposite. For some reason low carb guys like patio guys seem to want to push there belives on others. My mate feels great on 50 carbs a day and drops fat fast. Not as fast as I do on 300 carbs though
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk 2
I find lower carb works better until I hit about 8-10% then lower fat and bringing carbs up as calories go down helps keep muscle on me and when lean insulin sensitivity is a lot higher.
My approach currently while trying to grow is 2 days high carb one day low carb on non weight days.
You're right, depending on what chemicals you're using. Natural? No way. No way that high carb, low fat is better for ideal body comp than cyclic. Never gonna happen. Don't care who you are.
No. High carb world's better for me too natural. I don't use thyroid hormones or fat burners or even gh cutting. A calorie deficit is a deficit carbs or not. I keep protein at 250 and slowly bring fats down until all im adding is fish oil. I finished cut on 2800 calories this way. On them cals with my metabolism fat has no choice but to burn. All i used was test to hold muscle. I've cut naturally with high carb in past. 300 carbs is only 1200 calories. Carb phobia has got silly these days. Why will you not accept that SOME people respond very well to carbs. Some don't
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk 2
300 carbs isnt 1200 calories. Assuming your getting them all from rice which is zero fat and (i read thats what you like theres still 3-4gram protein in 35grams so 35gram carbs rice is 150 cals) meaning 300grams carbs from rice is 1285 calories (just saying)
Whenever I went low carb, higher fat for sustained periods of time, my recovery was hindered, pumps suffered, energy was low in the gym, etc.
When I went too low on fat I had joint issues, skin issues, mood issues, and digestive issues and shitty blood work. So super low fat = health problems for me.