- Joined
- Apr 21, 2020
- Messages
- 2
How sane is it to run a lowest-dose-possible (8mg/day) of methylstenbolone for 90 days? I realize that's probably pushing it in terms of length, I'm just doing a sanity check before I go through with that.
I really prefer low-dose, longer cycles over short ones. Methylstenbolone has given me probably the best gains of any compound I've run with the only exception being trenbolone. I really put those in a class of their own, for me, its methylstenbolone and trenbolone, then everything else. Yet, trenbolone is rough on the sides for me. Methylstenbolone has zero side effects for me even at a ridiculous 40mg/day for a month straight (the highest I've gone with this compound).
But yet, I'm sure the lipid/cardiac damage is probably pretty bad. Just doing a sanity check here, am I a madman for thinking this is an OK idea?
Also, I'm in my early 40's and on 100mg/week TRT.
I really prefer low-dose, longer cycles over short ones. Methylstenbolone has given me probably the best gains of any compound I've run with the only exception being trenbolone. I really put those in a class of their own, for me, its methylstenbolone and trenbolone, then everything else. Yet, trenbolone is rough on the sides for me. Methylstenbolone has zero side effects for me even at a ridiculous 40mg/day for a month straight (the highest I've gone with this compound).
But yet, I'm sure the lipid/cardiac damage is probably pretty bad. Just doing a sanity check here, am I a madman for thinking this is an OK idea?
Also, I'm in my early 40's and on 100mg/week TRT.