MICHAEL GUNDILL THEORY

[Nssca]

I like this idea. I have said for years, DC method does little else but cause injuries if done for more than a few weeks with out a long break using a method like this one in this thread.

 

[Oldlifter]

Nice thread! I wish I could have read it in my younger days!




.

 

[Gundill]

DC method does little else but cause injuries

one day, bodybuilders will realize that all the tendons are not meant to be stretched (tendons which slide on the bone should not be stretched to a great extend; the long head of the biceps especially) if you want to avoid what we call "front shoulder" pain

 

[Nssca]

one day, bodybuilders will realize that all the tendons are not meant to be stretched (tendons which slide on the bone should not be stretched to a great extend; the long head of the biceps especially) if you want to avoid what we call "front shoulder" pain

Thank You...
Finally, validation regarding the true nature and dangers of DC Methodology.

 

[Polska]

Along comes Mike Mentzer (whom I also knew). He takes this whole "HIT" notion to its logical, yet ridiculous conclusion, by having people train 2 sets every 2 weeks! Peolpe weren't getting gains at all, and of course not - they were DE-conditioning!

His diet/supplement theories were even more insane...

 

[AzCats]

Wow! Yeah, I am bumping a thread that was posted in 2003. Being new here at PM and going through over 500 pages of threads I found this one to be one of my favorites. It's a great read. Thanks PM

 

[cm]

good bump