MK-2866 with PCT

[DEE151]

looking for some feedback if any one here has ran osta MK with there pct and what do U think about it?
I am in week 14 of my 15wk cycle and was thinking wen i start my pct to run MK for 8wks at 25mg ed. will this be a good idea or Not?

 

[sammy555]

I did, it was very good. If i didn't blast and cruise now id do it every pct

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

 

[DEE151]

I did, it was very good. If i didn't blast and cruise now id do it every pct

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

so even if i run this with my pct for 4wks and continue running it for another 4wks after pct at 25mg ed would I still need a mild pct after i am done with it?
what are your thoughts on all of this?

 

[sammy555]

so even if i run this with my pct for 4wks and continue running it for another 4wks after pct at 25mg ed would I still need a mild pct after i am done with it?
what are your thoughts on all of this?

I ran it just like that then no pct at all. I am one of those people who never really needed pct though. Im not a big believer in it. My nuts grew back quick while i was on the ostarine though so didn't feel supresive to me

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

 

[DEE151]

I ran it just like that then no pct at all. I am one of those people who never really needed pct though. Im not a big believer in it. My nuts grew back quick while i was on the ostarine though so didn't feel supresive to me

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2

cool, thanks for the info. i am going to start my mk with pct.
did you notice any bf% drop while on the MK?

 

[soma]

It will affect your CHolestrol levels negatively- so if they are screwed up from orals on cycle or just from low estrogen then taking the mk-2866 will keep it messed up. My cholesterol was trashed after 12 wks on it post cycle. also my testosteron was still suppressed--but could be from being on AAS too long....

 

[garcia]

As with all SARMS, IMO, less effective than gear with all the side effects.

 

[DEE151]

As with all SARMS, IMO, less effective than gear with all the side effects.

this part is true

 

[waterpolo]

As with all SARMS, IMO, less effective than gear with all the side effects.

No it isn't...read some of the empirical studies. The side effects are less than AAS; however, they are not non-existent

 

[sammy555]

No it isn't...read some of the empirical studies. The side effects are less than AAS; however, they are not non-existent

Gives me worse acne than gear, i know that, and it can have quite an effect on cholesterol too from what I've read. It's an ok substance but id rather cruise on test. Very good when dieting i found

Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2