muscle recovers much faster than the cns.. but, the key is to train so tha the cns is not over taxed and numerous workouts can be achieved.. if one trains biceps for 6 sets once a week, why not do 3 sets twice a week?.. the same goes for anymuscle group really.. the issue is then can the joints take the repeated pounds of twice a week workouts.. or would it be more beneficial to split the amounts of sets in half so that the joints are not overtaxed or irritated by cutting the sets in half and training the muscle twice week..???? so what i am saying is that many in my gym would complain about aching joints.. well.. dont do 8 hard sets all in one day for delyts and the ligaments might thank you.. can a growth response be achieved in two or three sets?.. yes.. so if a growth response can be achieved in low volume and low volume does not tax the cns as hard and low volume does not irritate the joints ect ect and allows you to get a growth response twice a week ect ect.. well.. "i'm no rocket doctor..".. in other words it does not take a genius to figure this out.. i have aton more to add but, i am off to see the fights.. will be back later to finish.. i love thsi subject..
lats-
lets take joint pain out of the equation for this.
yes, splitting 6sets into 3sets 2x week i can see the point of.
but what i am saying is that if you do split the sets per bp up, you are just going to replace it with some sets for another bodypart in order to hit bp's 2xweek so the total volume you have done for the workout (all be it different bodyparts instead of just 1) will be the same. so you cns will be working with the same amount of volume as it would have anyway.................
so
1.how long would it take the cns to recover from this-typical 9 set wokout.
2.how many training sessions could you train without taxing the cns