- Joined
- Jan 7, 2016
- Messages
- 440
O'rly? For the presence of HCG it is very reliable.
False. Pregnancy test kit is a binary test yes/no to presence of HCG. I understand you have a lab that tests GH/anabolics/etc but you cannot legitimately say testing our GH to determine HCG content is not reliable. It's extremely reliable.
Cheap pregnancy tests, or lateral flow immunoassays, as they are called in my field, are prone to false positives, especially in matrices they are not meant to be used in.
I don't think I have any right to tell anybody how to test their stuff, just pointing out the facts.
Logical reasons why switching HGH for HCG doesn't make sense:
1. HCG is not that much cheaper than HGH. To be honest I believe that HCG is actually more expensive mg/mg than HGH, so what sense does it make to switch to more expensive product?
2. Switching a single vial in a kit suggests the manufacture is not automatized - there has to be someone switching the vials (and assumedly paid for it) further decreasing any gain from this behavior - would this be worth to anyone?
3. Why use HCG and not just filler? What you see in the vial - the lyophilised white powder is not HGH but more like 90% filler and 10% HGH. Simply not putting any HGH in there wouldn't be noticed by anybody.
4. Why use HCG if HCG has sides that are easily noticeable?
5. Why use HCG if HCG can be easily tested for by home tests or VERY reliable blood tests?
6. Why risk reputation being ruined for... well, not saving money?
If anybody can answer these then I'll reconsider my stance on this.
If anybody purchases a HGH that tests as HCG and sends it to me and it indeed proves to be HCG, I'll reimburse the customer fully for the cost of the testing and will reconsider my stance. I'm here to collect data, not argue, so when evidence is in front of me, I'll gladly accept it.