- Joined
- Oct 22, 2014
- Messages
- 612
I've used 100% legit norditropin pens for a long period of time. I've used TP's Ripatropin in their hay day. Now using Western Bio somastim. On none of these, including the legit pharma, did I ever feel a post injection sense of well being. That sounds silly. GH doesn't even work instantaneously like that. Frankly, this shit is so subjective, I have no idea how you guys can tell the difference with little nuances like how you feel and stuff. It takes running gh a good 2-3 months for me to even feel like I can weigh in on its effects fairly (in terms of leaning). They all make be hold a little water, they all increase my weight, they all improve the muscle tissue volumization. But other than those obvious indicators, it's hard for me to tell much difference in a short time span. After a good 3-4 months, the look the tissue has taken on is distinct. It's leaner with less fat in and around the muscle (the repartitiong effect of gh). Yet the muscle tissue is not flat like when leaner or dieted and you retain that "pop" and intra muscle hydration. You will generally have lost some VAT and midsection fat (if eating right) too. I really wish I could tell an immediate and noticeable difference between legit pharma and reputable generics like some of you apparently can, but I can't. I guess I don't have the guru expertise.
I read these type of threads and can't help but think a lot of placebo effect and wishful thinking is going on. Perceived benefits that aren't there or overblown statements based on flawed observations. I have no idea if some of these generics work as good, I'm getting a igf1 serum done soon. But most of what people say about gh seems like bs from my own personal experience with generics and what I know to be some of the best pharma around. I've only been on somastim a few weeks but I can't tell a god damn difference between it and the norditropin. This isn't an endorsement per se, because I have no idea how good it is yet. All I'm saying is I think some of you guys see a lot of shit that isn't there, and if you understood the pharmacology and physiology better, I doubt you'd even make such statements because they don't make sense. An immediate post injection feeling of "well being" from GH is not supported by science and is most likely all mental. So many people with zero fucking clue posting so much shit.
Oh great, cite some study on neurological effects that doesn't equate to any real world immediate sense of well being. I've never heard any reputable vet or any longtime users of gh brands ever say they get an immediate post injection sense of well being. Citing dbol in comparison is apples to oranges, that's well documented and there is logical reason for that.
I must be the only idiot on here who can't immediately tell the difference between generic gh and pharma within 20 seconds of it being injected, lol. Apparently, everyone else can. I probably can't tell the difference between Moet Imperial and High Life either.
it sounds like you have been using bunk gh and are upset so you're making excuses about how it takes 2-3 months to see the effects, if this were true then anyone starting gh for contest prep would have to wait halfway through their prep to see fatloss?
no one said anything about telling if gh was pharma or generic from side effects, it's just a side effect that comes with gh, ever read the side effects on the booklet that comes from pharm gh since you had those "100% legit norditropins" that took 2-3 months to 'feel'.
I do have a question though, do you wake up on day 60 and feel the gh kick in or can it happen on day 59? and if you don't feel anything by day 90 is it bunk if you start feeling the gh on day 91?
p.s i have quite a bit of gh serums and igf-1 blood work, my gh is real. Do you even have a baseline for your igf-1 to get bloodwork done on your generics ?
Last edited: