- Joined
- Mar 28, 2013
- Messages
- 1,664
In a few years, kids from today will come on here and start the very same thread to state how back in the day they all fell for fancy peptides xzb1234 or wkj9876 believing it was the pros' secret to build gigantic size while shedding tons of fat... :naughty:
Peptides are what Mega Mass, Cell Tech and Hydroxycut were in the 90s. Snake Oil to be exact. The only pro coach who seems to be recommend them a lot is Dennis James and his guys aren't exactly winning Mr O titles either.
Not trying to get into a pissing match fellas as I respect both of you and your opinions.. but with NUMEROUS labs from brothers of the iron along with clinical trials behind them Im bamboozled how people can still hate on peptides with a straight face?? Im mainly speaking of CJC/GHRPs and such..
As far as IGF LR3 being the holy grail I agree it is overhyped.. But can anyone sit back and say melanotan doesnt get you golden brown?? can anyone sit back and say igf1 scores ranging from 400-600 are classified as "not working??" but when someone posts a 450 igf score on some chinese gh its all OMG and such..
And Im not playing the rep card.. I was a believer in peptides way before I starting repping..
But when lab work confirms peptides work.. and people say they dont work... i guess we should clarify what the word "work" actually means..
Find me ONE person who has taken CJC w DAC and mk677 or ghrp6 and got zero results and had no change in bloodwork.. assuming they had real peptides you are essentially looking for a unicorn..
I agree that we still have alot to learn about the new myostatin peptides but there are tons of peptides that are tried and true..
Just because someone hasnt tried/doesnt understand peptides does not automatically make them "snake oil.."
just my .02
Last edited: