- Joined
- Feb 5, 2011
- Messages
- 76
Regardless, it's a horrible situation. Very sad
Absolutely. I would attack the pits owner like a wild dog if it happened to me.
Regardless, it's a horrible situation. Very sad
Even if it were true, this is a misleading statistic to quote and your final statement has no correlation to it. Pitbulls account for the largest number of attacks, deaths etc, despite being less than %5 of the dog population.
You are right. By your definition then some breeds are just safer breeds to have and some are just badder breeds to have, as far as biting/attacking. There is a reason that the police use German Shepards often they are easy to train for the job. They are loyal, have a good size and have a strong bite instinct that they learned through the generations of guarding. The police just need to channel that behavior over to the job they want the dog to do. I have had Boxers for years, they are very rowdy guy's that can get other dogs going very easy. so I try to tone it down before it starts. A trainer for the police that i was talking to told me that it takes them about 3x longer to train a boxer for guard work as they have to teach them to bite. The local animal control officer with 30+ years experience has told me that he can not ever remember seeing a vicious boxer, dominate yes but to attack and try to kill for no reason, nope. Most dogs will bite if given a reason,or at least if they think they have a reason. Going for the kill etc. is some thing that some breeds were bred for so they have a higher probability of doing just that.
Show us some statistics then. Dogsbite.org posts the studies they get their information from, including the CDC.
U.S. Dog Bite Studies - Dog Bite Statistics - DogsBite.org
Personally I'm not much of a conspiracy theorist and I don't think the media is out to get pitbulls.
Post up the links to your facts. Although I think it's good you foster pibulls, it amounts to a hill of beans in this discussion. Right now, it just looks like you have a personal affinity for the breed and are possibly overlooking cold hard facts.
Show us some statistics then. Dogsbite.org posts the studies they get their information from, including the CDC.
U.S. Dog Bite Studies - Dog Bite Statistics - DogsBite.org
Personally I'm not much of a conspiracy theorist and I don't think the media is out to get pitbulls.
Post up the links to your facts. Although I think it's good you foster pibulls, it amounts to a hill of beans in this discussion. Right now, it just looks like you have a personal affinity for the breed and are possibly overlooking cold hard facts.
The combination of large molosser breeds, including pit bulls, rottweilers, presa canarios, cane corsos, mastiffs, dogo argentinos, fila brasieros, and their mixes:
79% of attacks that induce bodily harm
72% of attacks to children
85% of attack to adults
69% of attacks that result in fatalities
77% that result in maiming
Discussion notes:
Even if the pit bull category was "split four ways," attacks by pit bulls and their closest relatives would still outnumber attacks by any other breed.
Pit bulls are noteworthy for attacking adults almost as frequently as children. This is a very rare pattern, only seen elsewhere in the bullmastiff/presa canario line.
If a pit bull or rottweiler has a bad moment, instead of being bitten, often someone is maimed or killed; that has now created off-the-chart actuarial risk.
1982-2012 chart
Breed Bodily harm Child Victims Adult Victims Deaths Maimings % of dog population
Pit bull 2235 911 806 233 1268 4.4%
Rottweiler 495 278 131 81 277 2.2%
Husky 71 44 5 24 20 .05%
Wolf hybrid 84 69 5 19 48
Bullmastiff (Presa canario) 87 30 33 14 46 .04%
German shepherd 96 60 28 14 59 2.3%
Pit bull-mix 148 63 37 12 83
Akita 65 42 19 8 47 .06%
German shepherd-mix 41 26 12 7 26
Chow 55 36 16 7 37 .01%
Doberman 15 8 7 7 7 1.3%
Your wasting your time, with these idiots. The truth and solid facts mean nothing to people of no education. Just like the facts mean nothing to Republicans and TeaBaggers:banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead:
Dogbite.org dosent have its facts straight. It's a site with an agenda I'm going to leave it at that.
This is an emotional issue, were many people have let their emotions make up their mind. The bottom line is if you were to cause the extinction of the pit bull today, the bites wouldn't be reduced. Because its the humans that need the education.
No dog is "safe" for kids, and the monsters are holding the leash.
Hey. Maybe you have agenda. I have no problem with the dog but under certain situations. As long, as you are okay to be held CRIMINALLY liable if one attacks a person. The problem is also the damage they inflict because of jaw strength. Just saying, if my child was mauled by one, they better put the owner under the jail before I get to him. You are right, there are multiple dog breeds I wouldnt have around my daughter. I think in general, Chows, can be more agressive BUT theres alot of idiots with pits who think it makes them tough. Not saying you. I would always air on the side of caution. I have seen the damage on the face of child from a pit bull. It was a family friends dog that the child got to close to its food.
Ericraven, my agenda is proper canine ownership. Always will be. Ans for idiots, I don't care what breed if your dog attacks some one unless defending home or owner, the owner is responsible. I have no issue with (even fought for) stricter dog laws, just not breed specific, I dont think felons should own a dog over 20lbs for one....now I answer your post due to it being mature. If you would like to talk in PM I have no problem. But I realy try to stay out of conversations on the web that a dont go anywhere due to emotions, and especially this fourm....I dont want to slip and give person information....Im well known in a field that is very small .
I agree you with you bro. I really agree on the felon portion. I am a protective dad. I had the worlds best Malamute, which can be on the list, who my children loved. I had another one that was animal agressive that I had to give away.
I think we agree more then disagree.
Ericraven, my agenda is proper canine ownership. Always will be. Ans for idiots, I don't care what breed if your dog attacks some one unless defending home or owner, the owner is responsible. I have no issue with (even fought for) stricter dog laws, just not breed specific, I dont think felons should own a dog over 20lbs for one....now I answer your post due to it being mature. If you would like to talk in PM I have no problem. But I realy try to stay out of conversations on the web that a dont go anywhere due to emotions, and especially this fourm....I dont want to slip and give person information....Im well known in a field that is very small .
WTF?? what does being a felon have to do with owning a dog? Ive got a pit a presa and 7 felonies...that matters to you why?
and being a pit fan I do fully believe in breed legislation. You shouldn't have a bunch of gang members and white trash chaining dogs to trees because they think it makes em look hard. Keep pits in the suburbs and countryside where they belong.
I agree. I too have felonies and a pit. Hes the most lovable dog youd ever meet, and the greatest companion you could ask for. Felonies dont have a damn thing to do with who you are or what you stand for. Im a hard working man who no longer sells anything. Even when I did I was never a thug, or dressed like a low class clown. My pants are always on my waste and I dont speak walmart.. Im educated. My gramar mistakes are do to being lazy on my galaxy s3 with no spell check in case you want to get smart.