Uh... if it was "out further it would float away?" ... well it seems that tonka toy tin can they sent up in 1969 didnt float away and it had 250,000 miles to do it in.
The space station is 375 miles out... thats how far the shuttle has been. No further. Your telling me that in 1969 we where hell bent on getting out out of the earths orbit and landing on other planets so bad we had to beat the Russians... but after that we just said fuck it, lets blow BILLIONS just to float around 400 miles or less and do nothing now? Sure... you know why? By faking the moon landing using a tin can and a couple of patsies to do it we generated EXACLY what was intended.... billions of dollars shoved into NASA and the defunked space program. So... why would we go back again? Its not going to generate billions.... its purpose was served. We beat the Russians and we filled the pockets of NASA and all the liars that faked the missions.
Now... you mentioned Russians putting dogs into outer space to test the radiation....
"Lets compare the Apollo cover-up with the USSR launch of the dog called Laika into space. She was launched into Space to see what the effects of Space travel would have on a live creature.
It was publicly announced that Laika died painlessly when her oxygen supply ran out, but the truth was finally revealed many years later that the dog had in fact died when the front nose cone of the craft carrying her had been ripped off after reaching Earth's orbit and that the dog probably died from the intense heat of the Sun.
Further investigations revealed that the nose cone had actually been designed to do this. So, in fact, the makers of the rocket had known that the dog would die even before she was sent into space... this evidence took 30 years to be revealed to the general public."
Also... the MAIN reason Russians had NOT sent anyone into space is because they had measured the amount of radiation and deemed it instant death to anyone trying to pass through the Van Allen belt. The space shuttle astronauts where even quoted as saying they where scared of the radiation coming from the Van Allen belt when they where docked at the international space station... the radiation was coming through the 1/4 inch thick aluminum shields on there helmets and they could see it with the naked eye.
Now consider this... they where not even remotely close to the Van Allen belt much less going through it.... and they had 2000k technology, not 1969 tonka toy Hollywood hyped play craft.
25) In 1998, the Space Shuttle flew to one of its highest altitudes ever, three hundred and fifty miles, hundreds of miles below merely the beginning of the Van Allen Radiation Belts. Inside of their shielding, superior to that which the Apollo astronauts possessed, the shuttle astronauts reported being able to "see" the radiation with their eyes closed penetrating their shielding as well as the retinas of their closed eyes. For a dental x-ray on Earth which lasts 1/100th of a second we wear a 1/4 inch lead vest. Imagine what it would be like to endure several hours of radiation that you can see with your eyes closed from hundreds of miles away with 1/8 of an inch of aluminium shielding!"
Now... the 32k memory computer.... what the hell? Are you going to tell me all the technology it would take to put a man 250,000 miles from earth... stay in communication, record data... send back photos and video... route the flight plans.... control the space craft and shoot it back through orbit relied on nothing more then a simple calculator sized computer? Come on man... get real. The damn space shuttle still fucks up via the computer and its the most sophisticated flight computer on earth. Yeah bro.. i can see Armstrong in outer space, 250,000 miles out using a damn double A battery sized calculator to figure out how long it was going to take to get back.... lets see, 250,000miles Xs 24 hours in a day... 24000 miles an hour... "duhhhh Nasa, my batteries died".... bwahahaha... im SURRRRE.
Oh... btw, the company (Hasselblad) and owners (Jan Lundberg) that made the SPECIAL camera that was said to have been used on the Apollo 11 mission publicly stated that there is no way there camera would have worked in the extreme temps the moon had. From -180F in the shade to an incredible +200F in full Sunshine.. They said the camera would have fucked up and never recorded a thing... thats from the COMPANY. Not a conspiracy theorist. Also, Kodak even publicly exclaimed that if they had film that would withstand those kind of temps then they would have been selling it to the public a long time ago. It doesnt simply didnt exist. Fact... not conspiracy bro
Shit man... how can anyone believe this bullshit. I mean, i know some think i am a fruitloop but if you open your mind and little and just "think" about this... its just bullshit. The main goal was to do something to generate the publics interest so they could funnel billions into a failing space program. Guess what? It worked! Most people would never think the government would try and pull off something like this... i say "why not"? It worked? It filled there pockets... they beat the Russians, it made them look superior.... yet we have quotes from the astronauts them self claiming the government was planning on taping this event in a studio just in case it failed.
I honestly feel sorry for all the people who are just this gullible and fall for this crap.
Now... will someone PLEASE take time to explain ONE simple question i have laid out here? IF THAT DAMN ROCKET LANDED ON THE MOON... IT HAD TO HAVE USED THE ROCKET POWERED BOOSTERS UNDER IT TO DO SO... THAT ROCKET SHOOTS OUT 10,000 DEGREE HEAT ECT... EVERYONE HAS SEEN THE PICTURES. EVERYONE AGREES THEY ARE REAL... SO PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW IN THE HELL THERE IS DUST AND SMALL ROCKS LAYING RIGHT UNDER WHERE THE THING WAS SAID TO HAVE LANEDED? HOW? HOW? My oscillating bed room fan will blow hard enough to do that... why didnt rocket thrusters that fly someone 250k miles do the same or any at all. Simple question. Whats the answer?
.gif "IP Gear")
