primo enathate vs EQ in last wks b4 contest

[Max32]

Wanted to see everyone's thoughts on this, my thinking has always been that EQ is "poor man's primo", obviously with an affinity for slight aromitization where primo does not; however, if an aromatase inhibitor is utilized, I would see them being pretty much identical. I have heard some possible brotelligent thoughts that EQ thickens the skin, and should be taken out in prep, maybe this is accurate, but just wanted to hear some thoughts and possible experiences on this subject, thanks in advance...

 

[Pristi1340]

primo seems to be the better choice

 

[tflexxin]

Nothing a little anti aromatizer can't handle. biggest problem is not really price, it's finding good quality EQ....Lots of shitty stuff where they throw test in instead. With the old school high quality EQ you could get rock hard and dry. Of course Primo is expensive and is somewhat superior, in that the addition of the anti-a is unnecessary. Opinions vary, but I've seen people get rock hard taking Enanthate all the way up to a show, soooooooooooo..