Pros dosages.....who cares!

robdarock · Mar 12, 2007

Why do I constantly see posts about what the pros are taking. Are some people that naive to think if they can just find that magical aas dosage amount they will achieve pro-like bodies? Thats like saying if I just new who trained Tiger Woods I too could be a pro golfer.

Enanthanator · Mar 12, 2007

Maybe they are just curious...

SqueezePlay · Mar 12, 2007

Enanthanator said:
Maybe they are just curious...

I have no desire to be that big, but it is intersting to learn the ins and outs of the sport, from dosages, nutrition, and workout routines. I'm not gonna eat the 6000 calories these guys do, nor can I press 500lbs for reps, but I do like the motivation of seeing what is possible, and how they got there.

mikeyt869 · Mar 12, 2007

they got there with genetics bud.... if you cant do damage in the sport naturally dont bother thinking aas could make you a pro. jmo

mike1107 · Mar 12, 2007

oh no not another thread on this subject

dude u just opened a war !!

GoneForever · Mar 12, 2007

I agree. Who cares. Yah it would be intresting to know, the truth is, we will never truely know. Plus, if Ronnie or Jay said they used 500mg/wk of test v.s. 5grams/wk, it wouldnt suprise me any differently. Its their genetics which contribute to most of their gains.

km2000 · Mar 12, 2007

waxy maize, pro doses, and trey brewer are fightin words around here!

GoneForever · Mar 12, 2007

km2000 said:
waxy maize, pro doses, and trey brewer are fightin words around here!

Yes, as well as Anthony Roberts and penis enlargement techniques.

hiddenbelow · Mar 12, 2007

There work ethic has alot to do with there success.... Not only their genetics.

TooPowerful4u · Mar 13, 2007

km2000 said:
waxy maize, pro doses, and trey brewer are fightin words around here!

LMAO

Putin · Mar 13, 2007

Genetics are number one. You can try taking 5g of gear a week and you still wont grow than if you took 1g/week. It's funny how many dipshits claim that the more gear you take the bigger the results. If that was a fact, gear is unlimited, I dont see these idiots getting any bigger!

robdarock · Mar 13, 2007

The point to this post was that alot of rookies want to know what the pros use because it HAS to be the sauce that got them there. So what do they do.... they try to emulate their gear use which MUST be a crap load because pros are ALL steroids LOL.

Uluwatu · Mar 13, 2007

I thought muscletech was the key to their success...sorry couldn't resist

bigfatandugly · Mar 13, 2007

km2000 said:
waxy maize, pro doses, and trey brewer are fightin words around here!

saw that trey kid in this months muscular developement.

now, i would be very curious as to his dosage, even if for the fact hes only 21and competing at 250ish.

i'm very sorry, but genetics can only account for so much.

i'd like to hear thoughts on this.

like, wtf is this kid running. lol.

BFU

robdarock · Mar 13, 2007

Trey is probably using quite a bit, but probably not anymore than any other top pro, he could probably be using half of what he is and would still be a freak!! Just look at Phil Heath who has only been training seriously for what, 4 yrs?? I dont think he is using huge amounts of anything

Qwert · Mar 13, 2007

It's just curiosity. No different than someone who's interested in steroes reading about a $200k audio system. They'd might never buy it, buy it sure is fun to read.

GoneForever · Mar 13, 2007

What you guys don't realize is the reason why they are so big is b/c they are mega dosing with gakic and X-factor.

km2000 · Mar 13, 2007

fourthgen said:
What you guys don't realize is the reason why they are so big is b/c they are mega dosing with gakic and X-factor.

dude bro thats stupid! its the luekic and no xplode, it increass protein synthesis by 834% every one knows that..

labboy · Mar 13, 2007

First of all you never should forget that ( lets take the top ten olympia competitors as a measure of the highest grade of inside info you can get ) these guys are THE GENETIC SUPERTALENTS of our sport.Supreme genetic potential is God given and whenever a person who has been blessed with it is also willing to invest the hard work, dedication and perseverence and find him/her self in numeral other positive circumstances as financial sources and good guidance, no injuries or other health setback and lots of support in their personal lives......he or she MAY become a succesful pro.
I think it's understandable that he question is often asked but to be honest I think you will NEVER get the precise info from the pro's. The info they share is probably just a fraction of what goes on in reality. I'm convinced that they are using products and procedures that we never even heard of, they will allways be 5 to ten years ahead of us. I'm also convinced that the contracts they have with the powers that be in the sport prohibit them of sharing the kind of info we are asking for during their carreers and even after they retire.
And last of all I am convinced some of them are guineepigs under contract for the pharmaceutical industry which however also will never be told by them due to great legal concequences that would have.

So the only way to get that big is to be born with the genetics required as well as the right mentality.Be lucky in health and choose the right wave of circumstances to surf on.And when you have been so fortunate that God gave you all this...... be so lucky that Gods brother, Joe Weider, sees $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ he can make on you.

Otherwise........train hard and be happy you dont look like most of the couchpotatoes on the block

iconoclast · Mar 13, 2007

robdarock said:
Why do I constantly see posts about what the pros are taking. Are some people that naive to think if they can just find that magical aas dosage amount they will achieve pro-like bodies? Thats like saying if I just new who trained Tiger Woods I too could be a pro golfer.

Is it so bad to really have that fantasy in one's head... it's sort of human nature to question and push boundaries. I am more inclined to believe that it's more curiousity and putting a face to the possibility vs the probability as it may relate to one person. It's putting a picture on the concept or plans going through someone's head, and then it's justified as a probability vs the possibility, because, well, here's public proof.

Of course, I am over thinking it. But I suppose maybe if Talent A. has a set regiment and Average B. isn't getting the gains they want quickly enough then it isn't far-fetched to assume that they would try to skip from B. to A. rather than taking committing to the steps involved to get to that point.

Or maybe it is simple as defining ones' limits, more so just curiousity. If the ever popular Talent A. has been doing this consistently with no public adverse effects so it isn't too far fetched to see that as a potential for average b to look towards as possible outcome and quite probable in consideration of boundaries, even if it's pure speculation and when other factors or considerations included to the overall formula.

But whatever.