Are anti-e's not controlled substances? They are under the "drug" classification are they not? Are there not classification levels? If so, at what level would you no longer be able to sell as a "research" product (ie: HGH and IGF vs Test or deca)
Well, first off, let's hope you are natural and not actually purchasing controlled substances with no knowledge of how drugs are classified legally and the penalties associated with possession.
No, AIs, SERMs, etc. are not controlled substances. Do you truly not understand what a scheduled drug is? If not, unbelievable first, and second research the Controlled Substances Act of 1970. Google works great for this.
So your research should answer your questions about classification levels.
There is no level at which you can no longer sell chemicals for research purposes. But, in order to possess and purchase controlled substances for research purposes, you must have a DEA number. I could order and possess pure MDMA (Ecstasy) a Schedule I, for research in rats for example, as long as I have a DEA # and an approved research protocol.
So the level for most people, both sellers and buyers, ends with controlled substances. Since these chemicals are not intended for human use, they do not fall under the control of the FDA. Despite the fact that they may be prescription drugs. This can be a slippery slope legally, but that is beyond the scope of this post. In a nutshell, the FDA can claim whatever they want and seek to prosecute. Regardless of the disclaimers or labeling stating not for human consumption. You would have to prove that you had no intent of selling these products for human consumption. The DEA obviously still has control over all scheduled substances regardless of their use intent.
HGH is unique in that it does not differ from other non-scheduled prescription drugs legally, but the FDA simply will not tolerate anyone selling HGH for research purposes and the DEA is specifically authorized to investigate distribution offenses.. Regardless of disclaimers or labeling, they will prosecute for GH due to the political climate surrounding it. As is, for now, they tolerate the peptides, ED meds, AIs, SERMS, etc.
We saw a few years ago that suppliers of the GHB precursor 1-4 butanediol were indeed prosecuted and convicted despite of their disclaimers regarding human consumption and intent of use. If the feds wanted to shut down these research chem suppliers they could do so quite easily.
Rex.
.gif "IP Gear")
