serious question, why run all these SARMS with test e 250 and not just a lower dose injectable? Every single one of those is weaker muscle builder, wrecks your lipids AND isn’t studied as much as normal AAS.
What’s the point in running all this funky stuff instead of just running some real proven stuff? Other than the cardarine which doesn’t qualify a lot of sarms are worse on you than even the hardest AAS and half the time you don’t even know what it is....
Good points for sure! I owned supplement stores for over 15 years. So cost on most sarms, before they were popular and went away, were so cheap. So that was a good reason to try them. Why do most ment or some other exotic like Superdrol? To see what the hype is about.
After years of different cycles and i always go back to the basics. I never said i prefered any sarms over aas. To me the best knowledge I could get from them was first hand experience. I really like cardarine and it seems to keep my lipids under control some when I do different things. Never had an issue.
I know a few good competing guys who still believe in taking sarms when off cycle. I just laugh and say on is on and off is off. Taking different compounds doesn't change the truth.
I also like mk-677. But would take gh hands down over it. For people who cant afford being on gh. I think mk is a good option. Not as good but hey a 3rd of the price.
We are lucky aas is so abundant right now and really good prices. Wasn't always this way and i am so sure wont last forever. Nothing beats Testosterone
Personally I'd add 100mg test and 200mg Mast a week
You come out way cheaper , get better effects and not fuck up your liver
The only two "SARM" I think are worth the effort are not actually SARM , MK-677 and Cardarine. The MK for better sleep and increase appatite and the Cardarine for increase cardio output and lipids
SR9009 is the only thing that I'd consider trying but haven't heard much feedback on it at all