- Joined
- Feb 28, 2006
- Messages
- 1,093
Senators pushing for new laws to combat steroids, HGH
By Sports Network
The Sports Network
U.S. lawmakers continue to respond to the fallout from last week's release of the Mitchell Report, and Senators Charles Schumer (D-NY) and Chuck Grassley (R-IA) are now pushing for stiffer criminal penalties for use and possession of performance-enhancing drugs.
Schumer and Grassley announced a set of proposals, acknowledging the problem that human growth hormone (HGH) is not a controlled substance. HGH is regulated by other laws, but it is not currently illegal to possess HGH, nor is its manufacturing process as closely regulated as that of anabolic steroids.
Schumer's proposal, entitled S.877, would add HGH as a Schedule III substance, equating it with anabolic steroids under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). That requires all legitimate manufacturers, distributors and dispensers of any controlled substance to register with the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA.) Manufacturers must keep data on production and disposal of their substances, including information on both sales and destruction.
Basically, without a current, valid prescription, HGH would be deemed illegal. Penalties for possession could be as high as three years imprisonment, depending on the circumstances of the case.
Grassley's proposal (S.2470) addresses the growing popularity of a performance-enhancing substance known as dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA). Also used as an anti-aging supplement, DHEA is a naturally-occurring precursor to testosterone, and a dietary supplement that some athletes are turning to as an alternative to illegal anabolic steroids. DHEA increases muscle mass, but could cause liver damage and cancer. Grassley's proposal would make it illegal to sell DHEA without a prescription to anyone under the age of 18.
"The real tragedy of the Mitchell Report is that it shows how easy it is to beat the system," Schumer said. "The majority of players named in the report are accused of taking human growth hormone, a drug for which there is currently no reliable test. We have to do everything we can to keep dangerous substances out of young hands. Together, these two bills are a big step in that direction."
According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, approximately 10 percent of high school athletes have experimented with or are regular users of anabolic steroids.
"These bills are a good step at getting at some of the issues we are seeing as athletes of all ages use performance enhancing drugs," Grassley said. "I'm hopeful that the sports industry will heed the wake up call and do something to deal with this problem. Professional sports figures need to realize that they are role models. It's time they shape up "without the drugs."
The House committee on Oversight and Government Reform has already scheduled a hearing on steroid use by Major League Baseball players, set for January 15 in the nation's capital. The subcommittee on commerce, trade and consumer protection has a hearing slated for January 23 on a similar issue.
--------
By the way, can someone please identify the bodybuilder they used in this picture below? And does anyone know they context in which they decided to use this guy as an example? I'm sure he died and they're blaming it on roids, or perhaps he murdered someone and it was GH overdose?
By Sports Network
The Sports Network
U.S. lawmakers continue to respond to the fallout from last week's release of the Mitchell Report, and Senators Charles Schumer (D-NY) and Chuck Grassley (R-IA) are now pushing for stiffer criminal penalties for use and possession of performance-enhancing drugs.
Schumer and Grassley announced a set of proposals, acknowledging the problem that human growth hormone (HGH) is not a controlled substance. HGH is regulated by other laws, but it is not currently illegal to possess HGH, nor is its manufacturing process as closely regulated as that of anabolic steroids.
Schumer's proposal, entitled S.877, would add HGH as a Schedule III substance, equating it with anabolic steroids under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). That requires all legitimate manufacturers, distributors and dispensers of any controlled substance to register with the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA.) Manufacturers must keep data on production and disposal of their substances, including information on both sales and destruction.
Basically, without a current, valid prescription, HGH would be deemed illegal. Penalties for possession could be as high as three years imprisonment, depending on the circumstances of the case.
Grassley's proposal (S.2470) addresses the growing popularity of a performance-enhancing substance known as dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA). Also used as an anti-aging supplement, DHEA is a naturally-occurring precursor to testosterone, and a dietary supplement that some athletes are turning to as an alternative to illegal anabolic steroids. DHEA increases muscle mass, but could cause liver damage and cancer. Grassley's proposal would make it illegal to sell DHEA without a prescription to anyone under the age of 18.
"The real tragedy of the Mitchell Report is that it shows how easy it is to beat the system," Schumer said. "The majority of players named in the report are accused of taking human growth hormone, a drug for which there is currently no reliable test. We have to do everything we can to keep dangerous substances out of young hands. Together, these two bills are a big step in that direction."
According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, approximately 10 percent of high school athletes have experimented with or are regular users of anabolic steroids.
"These bills are a good step at getting at some of the issues we are seeing as athletes of all ages use performance enhancing drugs," Grassley said. "I'm hopeful that the sports industry will heed the wake up call and do something to deal with this problem. Professional sports figures need to realize that they are role models. It's time they shape up "without the drugs."
The House committee on Oversight and Government Reform has already scheduled a hearing on steroid use by Major League Baseball players, set for January 15 in the nation's capital. The subcommittee on commerce, trade and consumer protection has a hearing slated for January 23 on a similar issue.
--------
By the way, can someone please identify the bodybuilder they used in this picture below? And does anyone know they context in which they decided to use this guy as an example? I'm sure he died and they're blaming it on roids, or perhaps he murdered someone and it was GH overdose?